Skip to main content

Is asgard.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - Asgard Sp. z o.o. Reviews

asgard.pl favicon

Is asgard.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Asgard Sp. z o.o.

Check if asgard.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherPolandmedium
WordPressElementorBootstrapjQueryGoogle reCAPTCHA+3 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:18:18 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Asgard Sp. z o.o. is a well-established Polish company specializing in the import and distribution of promotional gifts, serving advertising agencies across more than 30 countries. Their product range spans from popular pens to premium-class gadgets, supported by an online ordering platform named BLUE COLLECTION. The company has a solid market presence with over 32 years of experience and a medium-sized workforce. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Bootstrap, featuring modern web technologies and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks some advanced security headers and a formal incident response policy. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a good digital maturity level.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorBootstrapjQueryGoogle reCAPTCHAFont AwesomeSwiperOwl Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets advertising agencies and distributors, providing a comprehensive product catalog and marking services. Their business model includes direct import and distribution, supported by a digital platform for ordering and managing client accounts. The presence of awards, ethical codes, and social media engagement indicates a mature and reputable market position. The company operates primarily in Poland but serves a global client base. Growth indicators include a large number of monthly marked products and a stable employee base. Partnerships include the BLUE COLLECTION platform, enhancing their service offering.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@asgard.gifts

Phone Numbers (1)

+4861844****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Asgard Sp. z o.o.

Registration Number:

KRS: 0000110082

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of DNSSEC reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The company should consider enhancing security policies and publishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Asgard Sp. z o.o.

Description:

Asgard is a direct importer of promotional gifts, offering a wide range of products from popular pens to premium class gadgets. They serve modern advertising agencies with products including electronics and premium gifts.

Key Services:
Product marking sectionWarehouse and logisticsOnline ordering platform (BLUE COLLECTION)Customer support and distributor services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorBootstrapjQueryGoogle reCAPTCHAFont AwesomeSwiperOwl Carousel
Frameworks:
BootstrapElementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.emaillabs.net.pl include:_spf.getresponse.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:mex.asgard.gifts include:spf-eu.emailsignatures365.com -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3123 days)

DNS Records

A Records:80.87.32.131
Name Servers:
dns.home.plDNS only
dns2.home.plDNS only
dns3.home.plDNS only
MX Records:
10: asgard.pl
0: asgard-pl.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1603860022, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.emaillabs.net.pl include:_spf.getresponse.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:mex.asgard.gifts include:spf-eu.emailsignatures365.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and popular CMS (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Swiper, and Owl Carousel enhance interactivity. Google reCAPTCHA is used for bot protection on forms. Performance is moderate, with optimized CSS and lazy loading images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the site is served over HTTPS with a valid certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website