Skip to main content

Is asianetworkexchange.org a Scam? Security Check Results - ASIANetwork Reviews

A

Is asianetworkexchange.org Safe? Security Analysis for ASIANetwork

Check if asianetworkexchange.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statessmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:59:35 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ASIANetwork is an educational organization based in the US, established in 2011, likely focused on Asian studies or academic networking. The website currently serves as a security challenge page, blocking direct access to content. The technical infrastructure relies on outdated CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which pose significant security risks. Hosting is provided by Reclaim Hosting, and the domain is protected by a security service BitNinja.IO. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information is presented. Overall, the digital maturity is low with poor content quality and minimal SEO or accessibility features.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization appears to be a niche academic network serving educational professionals or students interested in Asian studies. The business model is likely non-profit or membership-based, with limited online services visible. The domain age and registrant data are consistent with a legitimate entity. However, the website's outdated technology and lack of modern web practices limit its competitive positioning and growth potential. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is protected by a WAF/security challenge (BitNinja.IO), which blocks direct content access and mitigates some attack vectors. However, the use of Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 introduces critical vulnerabilities. No security headers or HTTPS details are visible, and DNSSEC is not enabled. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The security posture is weak and requires urgent modernization and policy implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade CMS platforms to current supported versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security challenge with automatic redirect and a security check by BitNinja.IO, indicating a WAF or security protection mechanism is active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

ASIANetwork

Description:

ASIANetwork is an organization presumably related to Asian studies or academic networking, based in the US. The website content is minimal and primarily a redirect/security challenge page.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Frameworks:
JoomlaWordPress
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(399 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:174.138.84.81
Name Servers:
ns1.reclaimhosting.com
ns2.reclaimhosting.com
MX Records:
0: outofstep.reclaimhosting.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070901, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and vulnerable. Hosting is via Reclaim Hosting, and a third-party security service BitNinja.IO provides a WAF challenge page. The site lacks modern SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization. Performance is likely slow due to outdated tech and security challenge overhead. There is no evidence of analytics or marketing tools. The technical debt is high, and modernization is needed to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website