Is asigna.io Safe? Security Analysis for Asigna incorporated
Check if asigna.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Asigna is a specialized technology company offering multisig smart wallet solutions tailored for Bitcoin Layer 1 and Layer 2 metaprotocols. Their platform supports secure management of Bitcoin assets, DAO treasury management, and integration with various Bitcoin applications and smart contracts. The company targets cryptocurrency users, DAO managers, and blockchain developers, positioning itself as a niche provider in the blockchain wallet space. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure built on Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and formal incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms documents available but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in security and compliance transparency are recommended.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Asigna operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on multisig wallet solutions for Bitcoin and related metaprotocols. Their business model appears to be SaaS-oriented, providing wallet services and integrations for DAOs and Bitcoin applications. The company maintains an active presence on social media and developer platforms, indicating engagement with the crypto community. The lack of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common in crypto businesses. The platform supports multiple Bitcoin protocols and testnets, indicating a forward-looking development approach. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The company’s market position is specialized but credible within the cryptocurrency wallet niche.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit direct user engagement. The absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for maturity in security governance. Privacy policies exist but lack cookie consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Asigna incorporated
Asigna provides a multisig smart wallet solution for Bitcoin Layer 1 and Layer 2 metaprotocols, enabling secure management of Bitcoin assets, DAO treasuries, access to Bitcoin applications, and smart contract launching.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No forms detected to collect user input
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia elements.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No SPF record found
HIGHSPF helps prevent email spoofing
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 58 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: ruh6hdqxa5ugmxsttko3zz5nkmijykqfeokbwurzwlhxe3bfbkxa.mx-verification.google.com
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings