Skip to main content

Is asonaenergy.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - asonaenergy.pl Reviews

A

Is asonaenergy.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if asonaenergy.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyPolandsmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 11:25:43 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website asonaenergy.pl appears to represent a business in the energy sector, registered recently in 2024 with OVH SAS as the hosting and registrar provider. The site content is currently inaccessible due to a security challenge page, likely implemented by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service, which blocks direct access and redirects users after a browser integrity check. The visible content is minimal, showing only a loading animation and a message indicating an automatic redirect. The site uses outdated CMS technologies, Joomla! 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No business contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are present on the accessible page, limiting transparency and trustworthiness. The domain registration is consistent with a new business or project, but the lack of detailed registrant information and absence of DNSSEC reduces trust slightly.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content and minimal visible information, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain name and WHOIS data suggest a focus on the energy sector in Poland. The lack of visible contact details, policies, or business descriptions indicates the website may be under development or intentionally restricted. The external link to bitninja.io suggests the use of third-party security services to protect the site. No evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or additional business relationships was found. The business model and market positioning cannot be determined from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the use of outdated CMS platforms with known vulnerabilities and the absence of DNSSEC. However, the presence of a security challenge page and integration with BitNinja security services indicates some level of proactive defense. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement were visible in the HTML content, and no privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps. The domain registration is legitimate but lacks detailed registrant information. Overall, the site shows basic security measures but requires significant improvements to address vulnerabilities and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade the CMS platforms to the latest supported versions to mitigate known security vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check with automatic redirect and browser integrity check script, indicating a WAF or security challenge is active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100
Best Practices:
  • Browser integrity check script present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security check page with automatic redirect.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.webd.pl -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@asonaenergy.pl

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
none(2206 days)

DNS Records

A Records:194.181.228.30
Name Servers:
ns5.webd.plDNS only
ns7.webd.plDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.asonaenergy.pl
SOA:Serial: 2024092303, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.webd.pl -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated CMS technologies (Joomla! 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which pose significant security risks. The hosting provider is OVH SAS, a reputable registrar and hosting company. The site includes JavaScript for browser integrity checks and automatic redirects, indicating a security challenge mechanism likely implemented by BitNinja. The page performance is likely slow due to the blocking mechanism and lack of optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor, with minimal content and no responsive design elements detected. SEO optimization is also poor, with meta tags present but no meaningful content or structured data. The technical debt is high, and modernization is strongly recommended to improve security and user experience.
Analyze Another Website