Skip to main content

Is atomicstore.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - atomicstore.cz Reviews

A

Is atomicstore.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if atomicstore.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptPerimeterX
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:48:57 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website atomic.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that denies access to the actual content. This prevents any direct analysis of the business offerings, contact information, or detailed technical infrastructure. The domain itself is well-established, having been registered since 1994, and is managed by a reputable registrar with multiple domain status protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. The visible page is minimal and only serves as a bot mitigation mechanism, indicating a strong security posture in terms of access control but limiting transparency. Due to the blocking, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, nor are any contact details or business descriptions. The site does not expose any sensitive data or vulnerabilities on the accessible page, but the lack of accessible content results in a low overall AI score and limited insights.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptPerimeterX

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted from the accessible content. The domain WHOIS data suggests a long-standing registration, which may indicate a mature business or entity. No information about market positioning, business model, or services is available from the blocked page. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of accessible content and metadata prevents any competitive or strategic analysis.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a PerimeterX WAF challenge indicates a proactive security measure to prevent automated attacks and unauthorized access. The domain has multiple EPP status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers and updates, which is a positive indicator. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved. No security headers or SSL configuration details are visible from the blocked page. The security posture is strong in terms of access control but lacks transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a PerimeterX captcha security challenge denying access to the actual website content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptPerimeterX

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a PerimeterX WAF security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com include:%{l}._spf.%{d} -all exp=error._spf.amersports.com
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
31 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(259 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.1.124
Name Servers:
ns2.observatoiredesmarques.fr
ns3.nameshield.net
obs.ns1.fr
MX Records:
10: mxa-00153e01.gslb.pphosted.com
20: mx07-00153e01.pphosted.com
10: mxb-00153e01.gslb.pphosted.com
20: mx08-00153e01.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 2025080113, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com include:%{l}._spf.%{d} -all exp=error._spf.amersports.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses JavaScript and PerimeterX scripts for bot mitigation. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The page is minimal and does not contain SEO metadata or structured data. Performance, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The domain registrar is Nameshield SAS, and the domain is protected with multiple EPP status flags. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a technical shortcoming. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears to prioritize security and access control but at the cost of content availability.
Analyze Another Website