Skip to main content

Is atputalatgale.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - atputalatgale.lv Reviews

A

Is atputalatgale.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if atputalatgale.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:22:14 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website atputalatgale.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or suspicious traffic before granting access. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service that requires human validation. The page content is minimal and does not provide business or service information directly. The technical infrastructure includes legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, and Drupal, suggesting either outdated or placeholder content. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking visitor behavior. The security posture shows use of CAPTCHA for bot mitigation but lacks visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible without CAPTCHA completion, limiting content and business analysis.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the CAPTCHA challenge and lack of accessible content, no direct business information, market positioning, or company details are available. The presence of BitNinja security services suggests the site owner prioritizes protection against automated threats. The legacy CMS references may indicate an older or less maintained website. No contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are found, which reduces business credibility and transparency. The target audience appears to be general internet users attempting to access the site, but no specific business model or sector can be identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja's greylist CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated and potentially malicious traffic, which is a positive security control. However, the absence of visible security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) and no explicit HTTPS enforcement details are concerns. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration legitimacy. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps. The security score is moderate due to CAPTCHA usage but limited by missing best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure all traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The page is a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja indicating the visitor IP is greylisted and requires CAPTCHA validation before access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA validation page to verify visitors are not automated bots before allowing access to the requested content.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security check by BitNinja greylist mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.87 +a +mx +ip4:37.48.105.218 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:83.149.95.205
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: atputalatgale.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071301, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.87 +a +mx +ip4:37.48.105.218 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, and Drupal, which are outdated and may pose security risks if still in use. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. The CAPTCHA implementation uses Google reCAPTCHA v2, a standard bot mitigation tool. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but the user experience is limited due to the blocking challenge. The technical debt is evident from legacy CMS references and missing modern security headers.
Analyze Another Website