Skip to main content

Is audacy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - audacy.com Reviews

A

Is audacy.com Safe? Security Analysis for audacy.com

Check if audacy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:58:38 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.audacy.com is currently inaccessible due to geo-blocking or content restrictions, displaying only a minimal message indicating unavailability in the EU. No metadata, structured data, forms, or external links are present, preventing a thorough content or technical analysis. WHOIS data is unavailable, with the domain appearing unregistered or protected, raising concerns about legitimacy. The lack of HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and contact information further limits trust and security posture assessment. Overall, the site exhibits minimal digital maturity and poor security and privacy compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain's lack of WHOIS data and minimal web presence suggest either a placeholder domain, a geo-restricted service, or a domain with registration issues. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning details are available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak given the lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or incident response policies. The domain's WHOIS data absence and blocked content further complicate trust evaluation. No vulnerabilities or security best practices can be confirmed. Incident response readiness and compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be assessed.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve geo-blocking or content restriction to allow full site access for analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is blocked with a minimal message stating 'This site isn't currently available in the EU', indicating geo-blocking or content restriction.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to geo-blocking or content restriction.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=900"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 792-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:woexchange.com include:sogolytics.com ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(792-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.194.132, 151.101.2.132, 151.101.130.132, 151.101.66.132
Name Servers:
ns-1396.awsdns-46.orgDNS only
ns-1999.awsdns-57.co.ukDNS only
ns-289.awsdns-36.comDNS only
ns-867.awsdns-44.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:woexchange.com include:sogolytics.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or external resources, indicating either a placeholder or restricted site. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting details are detectable. Performance and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The absence of technical implementation details suggests a need for modernization and improved infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website