Skip to main content

Is aushermanfamilyfoundation.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Ausherman Family Foundation Reviews

aushermanfamilyfoundation.org favicon

Is aushermanfamilyfoundation.org Safe? Security Analysis for Ausherman Family Foundation

Check if aushermanfamilyfoundation.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/asmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressDivi ThemeMonarch Plugin
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:51:25 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Ausherman Family Foundation website represents a small non-profit organization focused on enhancing the well-being of Frederick County through grantmaking and community support. The site uses WordPress with the Divi theme and includes standard tracking technologies such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressDivi ThemeMonarch Plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation operates as a local non-profit entity serving Frederick County residents and organizations. Its business model centers on philanthropy and grantmaking, targeting community development. The website content is relevant and consistent with its mission but lacks detailed business information such as contact details or certifications. The use of common CMS and plugins indicates a standard digital presence without advanced technical differentiation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content or linked domains.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

301*******
301*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic with HTTPS in place but no detected security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, and no security.txt file is found. The site uses standard tracking scripts but lacks privacy and cookie policies, which may expose it to compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Recommendations include implementing security headers, formalizing privacy and cookie policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ausherman Family Foundation

Description:

Ausherman Family Foundation is a non-profit organization focused on enhancing the well-being of Frederick County through grants and community support.

Key Services:
GrantmakingCommunity supportPhilanthropy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressDivi ThemeMonarch Plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:208.65.145.247 -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1067 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.66.159
Name Servers:
ns97.worldnic.com
ns98.worldnic.com
MX Records:
0: aushermanfamilyfoundation-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Monarch plugin, indicating a widely used and supported CMS platform. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses standard CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness but basic SEO and accessibility features. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are identified. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations require improvement.
Analyze Another Website