Skip to main content

Is auto-centrs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Auto-Centrs.lv Reviews

auto-centrs.lv favicon

Is auto-centrs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Auto-Centrs.lv

Check if auto-centrs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryOwl Carousel+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:10:45 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Auto-Centrs.lv is a local automotive service provider based in Daugavpils, Latvia, specializing in light vehicle and minibus repairs. The company offers a broad range of services including car repairs, tire fitting and balancing, wheel alignment, air conditioning servicing, brake testing, and computer diagnostics. The website positions the company as a reputable and well-established service center with positive customer testimonials and a convenient location opposite the CSDD office in Daugavpils. The business model focuses on direct customer engagement with online reservation capabilities and clear contact channels.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryOwl CarouselSlick SliderGoogle Maps EmbedFacebook PixelGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets vehicle owners in the Daugavpils region, emphasizing quality service, experienced specialists, and a wide service portfolio. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized business with a strong local presence and customer trust. The inclusion of online booking and detailed pricing indicates a customer-centric approach. The partnership with KSDEV Group for website development suggests professional digital support. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The business leverages digital marketing tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics to monitor and optimize customer engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@auto-centrs.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712002****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes privacy and cookie policies, indicating baseline security and compliance awareness. However, no explicit security headers or incident response contacts are present, which could improve the security posture. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and consistent with the business claims. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance HTTP security headers and incident response transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Auto-Centrs.lv

Description:

Autoserviss Daugavpilī, specializējas vieglo automobīļu un mikroautobusu remontā un apkopē. Piedāvā auto remontu, sagatavošanu tehniskajai apskatei, riepu montāžu, kondicionieru uzpildi un citas saistītas pakalpojumu klāstu.

Key Services:
Auto remontsRiepu montāža un balansēšanaRiteņu savirze-sagāzumsGaisa kondicionieru uzpildeBremžu stendsDatordiagnostikaLukturu regulēšanaSagatavošanās tehniskajai apskatei
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3BootstrapjQueryOwl CarouselSlick SliderGoogle Maps EmbedFacebook PixelGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Privacy policy and cookie consent present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 include:zoho.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.eu
50: mx3.zoho.eu
20: mx2.zoho.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:211ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 include:zoho.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and popular plugins like Owl Carousel and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Maps integration and video popups enhance user engagement. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive menus and forms. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from modernization in security practices.
Analyze Another Website