Is autokredit.lv Safe? Security Analysis for autokredit.lv – Ātri un viegli iegūstama nauda par jūsu auto
Check if autokredit.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website autokredit.lv provides financial services specializing in quick and easy loans secured by vehicles, targeting Latvian car owners. The site is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The content is primarily in Latvian and focuses on car-backed loans, but lacks comprehensive business and contact information. The technical infrastructure is basic with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is limited, with no evident security headers or advanced protections, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site functions as a basic financial service platform but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance trust and user confidence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Autokredit.lv operates in the finance sector, offering vehicle-backed loans to individuals in Latvia. The business model is direct online loan provision, likely generating revenue through interest and fees on loans. The target audience is Latvian vehicle owners seeking fast cash loans. The website does not disclose company registration or detailed business information, which limits competitive and partnership insights. There is no evidence of certifications or trust badges. The lack of contact details and policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. The site appears to be a small-scale operation with a focused niche in the Latvian market.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity of autokredit.lv is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses risks. The site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Website offers quick and easy money loans secured by your car.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 44 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings