Skip to main content

Is automatad.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Mile Reviews

automatad.com favicon

Is automatad.com Safe? Security Analysis for Mile

Check if automatad.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFactors.aijQuery+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:08:42 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Mile is a specialized AI-driven optimization platform targeting digital publishers to maximize ad revenue through dynamic flooring, bid enrichment, and intelligent traffic shaping. The company positions itself as a partner to publishers, offering real-time analytics, A/B testing, and dedicated support to improve monetization outcomes. The website reflects a focused B2B SaaS business model with strong branding and client trust signals. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper and Splide for UI components, and integrates analytics and tracking tools including Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Factors.ai. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and accessible with good SEO practices. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism despite using tracking scripts, which is a privacy compliance gap. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, but the absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, Mile.tech is a professional, trustworthy platform with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Privacy compliance and security transparency could be improved to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFactors.aijQuerySwiper.jsSplide.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Mile operates in the ad tech sector, focusing on AI-powered yield optimization for publishers. Its competitive advantage lies in real-time AI pricing, bid enrichment, and traffic shaping, enabling publishers to increase CPMs and fill rates. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium to large digital publishers seeking advanced monetization tools. The company demonstrates a partnership approach with dedicated support and analytics services. Its client portfolio includes recognizable publishers, enhancing market credibility. The presence of podcasts and case studies indicates active thought leadership and industry engagement. Growth indicators include multiple offices across USA, UK, and India, and positive customer testimonials. The ecosystem includes integrations with major ad networks and analytics providers, but no direct subsidiaries or parent companies were identified. Strategic observations suggest Mile is well-positioned in a niche market with opportunities to expand privacy and security offerings to meet evolving regulatory demands.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Mile.tech exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking services. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a transparency gap that could affect stakeholder trust. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting external reporting channels. Privacy compliance is partial; while a comprehensive privacy policy exists and GDPR compliance is indicated, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a notable deficiency. The site uses tracking scripts that collect user data, but without explicit consent banners, this may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mile

Description:

Mile is the AI optimization layer that seamlessly integrates into your wrapper, helping you maximize yield and revenue with dynamic flooring, bid enrichment, and intelligent traffic shaping.

Key Services:
Dynamic FlooringBid EnrichmentTraffic ShapingAd Serving AI decisioningRevenue AnalyticsA/B Testing and ExperimentationAd Management
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFactors.aijQuerySwiper.jsSplide.js
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerFactors.ai
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Kwanzoo
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityFactors.ai
Marketing Tools:
Factors.ai
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on AI-driven ad optimization for publishers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@mile.tech

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 25 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(56 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1710836606, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:178ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper and Splide for interactive UI elements. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Factors.ai, indicating a data-driven approach. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags.
Hosting is managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure. The technical implementation is clean with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance mechanisms and enhance security transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements in compliance and security documentation.
Analyze Another Website