Skip to main content

Is autoservissjugla.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Autoserviss Jugla Reviews

A

Is autoservissjugla.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Autoserviss Jugla

Check if autoservissjugla.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle FontsLazySizesSlider Revolution
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:58:50 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Autoserviss Jugla is a small local automotive service provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in vehicle repair, diagnostics, tire services, and maintenance for light and off-road vehicles. The company emphasizes professional service with experienced staff and modern equipment, targeting vehicle owners in the Riga region. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, with a moderate level of technical sophistication and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The presence of customer testimonials and clear contact information enhances business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps that should be addressed. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image for a local automotive service business.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle FontsLazySizesSlider Revolution

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Autoserviss Jugla operates in the transportation sector, providing essential vehicle repair and maintenance services. The business model focuses on direct service delivery to local customers, leveraging experienced technicians and modern equipment. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration and customer testimonials, supporting customer trust and engagement. The website content and structure suggest a stable small business with a focus on quality service rather than aggressive marketing or expansion. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company was founded around 2015, consistent with the website's published date. The business targets individual vehicle owners and possibly small fleet operators in Riga.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@autoservissjugla.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712802****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses standard WordPress plugins, which should be regularly updated to avoid vulnerabilities. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Autoserviss Jugla

Description:

Autoserviss veic visa veida vieglo un apvidus auto, remontdarbus un diagnostiku neatkarīgi no auto markas. Profesionāls riepu serviss.

Key Services:
Auto repairDiagnosticsTire serviceVehicle maintenance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle FontsLazySizesSlider Revolution
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelGoogle Analytics (via gtag)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:autoservissjugla.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (88 days)
SANs:autoservissjugla.lv, *.autoservissjugla.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.64.234, 172.67.137.179
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:40ea, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:89b3
Name Servers:
aliza.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
piers.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2379321925, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a common and well-supported platform. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Lazy loading of images is implemented via LazySizes, improving performance. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No hosting provider information was found in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no evident advanced SEO techniques.
Analyze Another Website