Is autosportawards.com Safe? Security Analysis for Autosport Awards | News | Autosport.com
Check if autosportawards.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website autosport.com is a well-established online media platform specializing in autosport news and awards coverage, with a history dating back to 1994. It targets motorsport enthusiasts and the general public interested in racing events and related news. The site offers daily updated articles and maintains consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, and uses HTTPS for secure communication. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in transparency and privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Autosport.com operates as a large media entity within the motorsport sector, providing news and event coverage. Its business model revolves around content publishing and likely advertising revenue, supported by analytics and tracking tools. The site appears to have a strong market position given its longevity and consistent content updates. The target audience includes motorsport fans globally. The lack of explicit business contact information and WHOIS data limits deeper business intelligence insights. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications was found. The use of third-party analytics and tag management introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, security practices are adequate but require improvements to meet higher standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
New articles about autosport events added every day since 1994.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is accessible with full content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Expires Soon
HIGHDomain expires in 18 days
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings