Skip to main content

Is autoteh.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA “CSP auto” Reviews

autoteh.lv favicon

Is autoteh.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA “CSP auto”

Check if autoteh.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
WordPressPHPJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:06:31 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

AUTOTEH.LV operates as a small automotive service and rental business based in Riga, Latvia. The website clearly communicates its core offerings of auto servicing and vehicle rental, targeting local customers. The business is registered as SIA “CSP auto” with a physical address and contact details prominently displayed, supporting its legitimacy. The website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Twenty-Two theme, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with a clean, mobile-optimized design and basic SEO features. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates gaps in compliance with data protection regulations. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosures, which could be improved to enhance trust and protection. Overall, the site presents a professional front for a small local business but would benefit from bolstered privacy and security measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a local provider of automotive repair and rental services in Riga, Latvia. Its business model focuses on direct service delivery to individual customers and possibly small businesses requiring vehicle rental or maintenance. The presence of a Facebook page suggests some engagement with customers via social media. The lack of extensive digital marketing or analytics tools indicates a modest online presence. The company’s registration details and physical address add credibility, though the absence of privacy and terms policies may limit trust for privacy-conscious users. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a standalone small business operation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712933****
+3712984****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA “CSP auto”

Registration Number:

40203124644

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing standard web security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA “CSP auto”

Description:

Auto serviss and auto rental services located in Riga, Latvia, offering vehicle servicing and rental.

Key Services:
Auto servicingAuto rental
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScript
Frameworks:
WordPress Twenty Twenty-Two theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based small business site for auto service and rental in Riga, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.240 +ip4:85.31.97.40 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.240
Name Servers:
ns1.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: autoteh.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062200, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:178ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.240 +ip4:85.31.97.40 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the default Twenty Twenty-Two theme, indicating a standard and widely supported platform. The site loads JavaScript for emoji support and uses standard CSS stylesheets. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. Performance is moderate, likely due to standard hosting and no advanced optimization techniques observed. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website