Skip to main content

Is availproject.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Avail Project Reviews

availproject.org favicon

Is availproject.org Safe? Security Analysis for Avail Project

Check if availproject.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Next.jsReactJavaScriptKZG polynomial commitments (blockchain tech)Data Availability Sampling+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:32:11 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Avail Project operates as a blockchain infrastructure provider focusing on modular, horizontally scalable, and trust-minimized blockchain base layers. Their platform offers key products such as a data availability layer (availDA), a light client (availLC), an interoperability layer (availNexus), and a shared security solution (availFusion). The website targets blockchain developers and ecosystem participants, positioning itself as an essential foundational technology for next-generation decentralized applications. The company emphasizes scalability, interoperability, and security in the blockchain space. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with multimedia content and SVG graphics enhancing user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. Analytics are implemented via Plausible and PostHog, but no cookie consent mechanism is present. Security best practices such as HTTPS are enforced, but explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. From a security perspective, the site shows a good posture with no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents an area for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common and justified for blockchain projects but slightly reduces trust signals. Overall, Avail Project presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound web presence with strong business credibility in the blockchain infrastructure sector. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further enhance their risk profile and stakeholder confidence.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactJavaScriptKZG polynomial commitments (blockchain tech)Data Availability SamplingVideo embedding (webm)SVG graphics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Avail Project is positioned as a niche but essential player in the blockchain infrastructure market, focusing on modular blockchain scalability and interoperability. Their business model revolves around providing foundational blockchain layers and tools that enable developers and projects to build scalable, trust-minimized applications. The presence of open-source repositories, developer portals, and active community channels indicates a growth-oriented and collaborative approach. Revenue streams likely include staking, network fees, and ecosystem incentives. The company targets blockchain developers, dApp builders, and ecosystem integrators, aiming to unify fragmented blockchain ecosystems. Partnerships and ecosystem engagement are evident but no explicit partner domains were identified. The company appears small but specialized, with consistent branding and high-quality content supporting its market credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program is published, which limits transparency and preparedness signals. Analytics tracking is present without a cookie consent mechanism, which may raise privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. WHOIS privacy protection is used, which is justified but reduces registrant transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and implementing privacy compliance mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Avail Project

Description:

Avail is the essential modular blockchain base layer for next-generation, trust-minimized applications. It provides a horizontally scalable, trust-minimized infrastructure network enabling seamless cross-chain interaction, transaction validation, and native liquidity interoperability.

Key Services:
availDA - Data Availability LayeravailLC - Light ClientavailNexus - Interoperability LayeravailFusion - Shared Security Layer
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactJavaScriptKZG polynomial commitments (blockchain tech)Data Availability SamplingVideo embedding (webm)SVG graphics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible AnalyticsPostHog Recorder
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:35d5f39db4c0454988c8ef145ce36aa7@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net, rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(98 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
leland.ns.cloudflare.com
sneh.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382222174, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks for server-side rendering and client-side interactivity. Multimedia content such as videos and SVG graphics are used effectively to communicate product features. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Analytics are implemented via Plausible and PostHog, indicating an interest in user behavior insights. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and prefetching used. However, the absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with minor gaps in security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website