Skip to main content

Is avasant.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Avasant Reviews

avasant.com favicon

Is avasant.com Safe? Security Analysis for Avasant

Check if avasant.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPress 6.6.2WooCommerce 7.9.0Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel+7 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:18:54 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Avasant is a well-established management consulting firm specializing in strategic sourcing, digital and IT transformation, global development, and governance services. The company targets global enterprises, government, and non-profit sectors, offering a broad range of consulting and research services. Their market position is strong, supported by a mature domain and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, and Matomo, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, with extensive user tracking balanced by a comprehensive cookie consent system.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.6.2WooCommerce 7.9.0Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelHubSpot FormsStripeCloudflare (implied by cookies)InspectletHotjarMatomo AnalyticsCookieYes Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology and consulting sectors, serving a diverse set of industries including finance, government, and non-profits. Their business model revolves around providing advisory services, benchmarking, and research products. The presence of partner domains like globalequations.com suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The firm has a global reach and a medium-sized organizational footprint, founded in 2008. Their digital presence is optimized for user experience and SEO, supporting growth and client engagement. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a preference for controlled lead capture via contact forms.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Avasant demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. Multiple security and analytics cookies are used, including Google reCAPTCHA and Cloudflare bot management cookies, indicating proactive bot and spam protection. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and no public security or incident response policies are published. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The absence of direct security contact channels limits transparency for incident reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and improving header configurations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Avasant

Description:

Leading management consulting firm specializing in sourcing advisory, digital and IT transformation, global development, and governance services.

Key Services:
Strategic Sourcing ConsultingGCC Consulting & OperationsIT & Digital Transformation ConsultingVendor ManagementBusiness & Process Transformation ConsultingSupply Chain ConsultingAI Strategy & ConsultingDigital Public Infrastructure ConsultingSoftware Selection ConsultingLegal & Transactional Services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.6.2WooCommerce 7.9.0Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelHubSpot FormsStripeCloudflare (implied by cookies)InspectletHotjarMatomo AnalyticsCookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of bot protection cookies (Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMatomoInspectletHotjarHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook AdsGoogle DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMatomoInspectletHotjar
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotCookieYes
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@avasant.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(620 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.124.249.11
Name Servers:
ns17.domaincontrol.com
ns18.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: avasant-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090103, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce, integrating multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and payment processing (Stripe). The presence of Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot forms, and Matomo analytics indicates a sophisticated tracking and marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and semantic HTML. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy with Cloudflare CDN and security services implied by cookies. Technical debt is minimal, but security header implementation could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business goals effectively with opportunities for enhanced security and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website