Skip to main content

Is awwwards.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Awwwards Reviews

awwwards.com favicon

Is awwwards.com Safe? Security Analysis for Awwwards

Check if awwwards.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsSwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:37:53 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Awwwards is a recognized platform that provides website awards, showcasing the best web design trends and inspiring developers, designers, and agencies worldwide. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and user experience, targeting web professionals seeking inspiration and recognition. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and popular libraries like Video.js and Swiper.js, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the security posture is moderate due to the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit SSL configuration details. Privacy compliance is weak as no privacy or cookie policies were detected. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not necessarily reflect on the business legitimacy given the professional site content. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsSwiper.jsInter Tight font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Awwwards operates in the technology sector as a medium-sized entity focused on web design awards and community engagement. Its business model revolves around recognizing and promoting web design talent globally, attracting web developers, designers, and agencies as its primary audience. The platform likely generates revenue through sponsorships, advertising, and possibly premium memberships or events. The company maintains a strong market position as a leader in web design awards, supported by consistent branding and high-quality content. The lack of explicit business registration or contact information in the provided data limits deeper insights into corporate structure or partnerships.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact information, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests potential compliance issues with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public-facing informational site but requires enhancements to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Awwwards

Description:

Awwwards are the Website Awards that recognize and promote the talent and effort of the best developers, designers and web agencies in the world.

Key Services:
Website awardsWeb design inspirationWeb design trends
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptVideo.jsSwiper.jsInter Tight font
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and professional.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

62/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:email.freshdesk.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+e2287cc87543@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:5.57.227.251
AAAA Records:2a00:de40:10:316::100
Name Servers:
ns0.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns1.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns3.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns4.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2009010159, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:email.freshdesk.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a modern front-end technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and libraries like Video.js and Swiper.js for media and UI components. The use of the Inter Tight variable font indicates attention to typography and design. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of the front-end assets. Accessibility features are present but could be further audited for compliance. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy best practices but may limit marketing insights.
Analyze Another Website