Skip to main content

Is axa.sk a Scam? Security Check Results - AXA Partners CEE Reviews

axa.sk favicon

Is axa.sk Safe? Security Analysis for AXA Partners CEE

Check if axa.sk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSlovakialarge
ASP.NET WebFormsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentFont AwesomejQuery (implied by ASP.NET WebForms scripts)
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 4:27:32 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AXA Partners CEE operates the AXA Assistance Slovakia website providing travel insurance, legal protection insurance, and health insurance for foreigners. The company positions itself as a trusted insurance provider with extensive experience and a strong brand presence in the Slovak market. The website targets Slovak residents and foreigners requiring insurance services, offering online insurance purchase and 24/7 assistance. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with integration of modern marketing and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with good content quality and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

ASP.NET WebFormsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentFont AwesomejQuery (implied by ASP.NET WebForms scripts)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages its established AXA brand to offer a range of insurance products primarily focused on travel and health insurance for Slovak customers and foreigners. The business model includes direct online sales and assistance services, supported by a professional website and customer contact channels. The presence of partner domains for careers and claims reporting indicates a structured ecosystem. The company targets a broad customer base including individuals and business clients (Travel 4 Business). The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence with compliance to GDPR and marketing best practices.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

z*****@axa-assistance.cz

Phone Numbers (2)

+4212206*****
+4212206*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident and should be added to enhance protection. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could improve transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts is controlled with consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from additional hardening and formal security disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AXA Partners CEE

Description:

AXA ASSISTANCE poskytuje cestovné poistenie, poistenie právnej ochrany a zdravotné poistenie cudzincov

Key Services:
Cestovné poisteniePoistenie právnej ochranyZdravotné poistenie cudzincovPoistenie autoasistencie
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ASP.NET WebFormsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentFont AwesomejQuery (implied by ASP.NET WebForms scripts)
Frameworks:
ASP.NET
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (commented out)Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (commented out)Google Ads
Marketing Tools:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:82.119.240.89 ip4:194.212.80.0/24 ip4:194.212.89.0/24 ip4:194.212.90.0/24 ip4:171.18.34.0/24 include:spf-00181c02.pphosted.com include:spf-bulk.axa.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc.report@axa.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc.failure@axa.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 12 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(244 days)
Protection Level
strong

DNS Records

A Records:194.212.89.233
Name Servers:
ns1.markmonitor.com
ns2.markmonitor.com
ns3.markmonitor.com
ns4.markmonitor.com
ns5.markmonitor.com
ns6.markmonitor.com
ns7.markmonitor.com
MX Records:
10: mxa-00181c02.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxb-00181c02.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062001, TTL: 172800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:82.119.240.89 ip4:194.212.80.0/24 ip4:194.212.89.0/24 ip4:194.212.90.0/24 ip4:171.18.34.0/24 include:spf-00181c02.pphosted.com include:spf-bulk.axa.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms technology, indicating a mature but somewhat legacy platform. It integrates modern tools like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard libraries such as Font Awesome. Performance appears moderate with no major issues detected. The site uses a custom or proprietary CMS. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could be enhanced for future scalability and security.
Analyze Another Website