Skip to main content

Is axelar.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - Axelar Foundation Reviews

axelar.foundation favicon

Is axelar.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for Axelar Foundation

Check if axelar.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:18:55 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Axelar Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting the growth and adoption of the Axelar network, a decentralized interoperability platform connecting over 50 blockchains. The foundation's website presents a professional and consistent brand image, highlighting its role in enabling scalable cross-chain solutions and fostering a permissionless ecosystem. The site targets developers, blockchain users, validators, and stakers, emphasizing ease of integration and security features. Backed by prominent industry players, the foundation holds a credible position in the blockchain interoperability sector. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical debt or errors detected. The site integrates an email sign-up form via MailerLite but lacks advanced analytics or tracking services. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present. Contact information is limited to a single company email address, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. Privacy and terms of use policies are available but hosted externally on Notion pages, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency. The overall risk assessment indicates a legitimate and trustworthy nonprofit blockchain foundation with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing detailed security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Axelar Foundation operates as a nonprofit entity supporting the Axelar network, a key player in blockchain interoperability. The foundation benefits from strong backing by major blockchain investors, positioning it well within the decentralized finance and Web3 ecosystem. Its business model focuses on ecosystem growth, developer enablement, and network security through staking and validator participation. The foundation's partnership ecosystem includes major exchanges and venture funds, enhancing its credibility and reach. Growth indicators include active community engagement via multiple social platforms and educational resources. Revenue streams are not explicitly detailed, consistent with nonprofit status. Strategic observations suggest a focus on long-term network sustainability and broad adoption through developer-friendly tools and decentralized governance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@axelar.foundation

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent is missing. The limited contact information restricts incident reporting channels. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. Overall, the security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls to mitigate risks and build stakeholder trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Axelar Foundation

Description:

A nonprofit established to support the growth and adoption of the Axelar network, a decentralized interoperability platform that serves multiple blockchain ecosystems.

Key Services:
Support for Axelar network growthPromotion of decentralized interoperabilityEducational resources and staking facilitation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact email uses company domain

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MailerLite
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(166 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 9, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:443ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery 3.5.1. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow's infrastructure, providing reliable uptime and moderate performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and clear navigation, contributing to a positive user experience. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and descriptive content. However, the site lacks advanced analytics and tracking tools, limiting insights into user behavior. Technical debt is minimal, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the foundation's mission effectively but could benefit from modernization in security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website