Skip to main content

Is babylon.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - Babylon Foundation Reviews

babylon.foundation favicon

Is babylon.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for Babylon Foundation

Check if babylon.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerCloudflare hosting+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:29:57 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Babylon Foundation is a technology-focused organization dedicated to building native use cases for Bitcoin, including the development and distribution of the BABY token. The website positions itself as an emerging player in the Bitcoin ecosystem, targeting cryptocurrency users and developers interested in decentralized innovation. The foundation provides user guides, technical documentation, and airdrop registration services to engage its community. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and is hosted on Cloudflare, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerCloudflare hostingCloudflare Insights

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Babylon Foundation operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on Bitcoin-native applications and tokenomics. Its business model revolves around community engagement through token airdrops and educational content. The foundation is relatively new, founded in 2023, and maintains a small organizational size. The website content and domain registration data align well, indicating a consistent and legitimate operation. The foundation leverages partnerships or services such as a dedicated airdrop subdomain. Growth potential exists in the expanding Bitcoin ecosystem, but the foundation currently lacks visible certifications or extensive trust signals beyond domain registration and HTTPS.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections. However, it lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency for security concerns. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism also indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Babylon Foundation

Description:

Building native use cases for Bitcoin, offering tokenomics information, user guides, and airdrop registration for the BABY token.

Key Services:
Bitcoin native use-case developmentBABY token airdropUser guides and technical documentation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQuery 3.5.1Google Tag ManagerCloudflare hostingCloudflare Insights
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Platforms:
Cloudflare
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerCloudflare Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "strict-origin-when-cross-origin, no-referrer"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:devops@babylonlabs.io
Forensic Reports:devops@babylonlabs.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:babylon.foundation
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/26/2025 (50 days)
SANs:babylon.foundation

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(1321 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.0.82, 104.18.1.82
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:152, 2606:4700::6812:52
Name Servers:
blue.foundationdns.comDNS only
blue.foundationdns.netDNS only
blue.foundationdns.orgDNS only
ernest.ns.cloudflare.comWHOIS only
rihana.ns.cloudflare.comWHOIS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381912765, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts and jQuery 3.5.1, and is hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Insights for analytics and tracking, indicating moderate user tracking levels. No CMS-specific vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the foundation's needs, though improvements in accessibility and security headers would enhance overall robustness.
Analyze Another Website