Skip to main content

Is baltgran.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - BaltGran Reviews

B

Is baltgran.lv Safe? Security Analysis for BaltGran

Check if baltgran.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:46:55 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

BaltGran is a small Latvian company specializing in construction and wood processing products, including wood granules. The website is simple and functional, providing navigation to its two main service areas. The business appears to target local or regional customers interested in construction and wood materials. The digital presence is basic but uses modern responsive design with Bootstrap 5.3.3. However, the site lacks comprehensive business information, privacy policies, and security features. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits transparency about domain registration details. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or HTTPS verification in the provided data. Overall, the website is safe and professional but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and richer business content to improve trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

BaltGran operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on construction and wood products. The business model is service and product provision with a likely local customer base. The website does not reveal detailed market positioning or partnerships. The lack of analytics and tracking suggests a low digital marketing footprint. The company uses a straightforward website with minimal content, indicating a small or medium-sized enterprise. No certifications or trust badges are displayed. The contact information is limited to a personal email address, which may impact perceived professionalism. Growth opportunities could include expanding digital presence and adding compliance documentation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

r*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details were provided, and no security headers were detected. The site does not include privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No forms or data collection points were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is common for small businesses using privacy protection. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BaltGran

Description:

BaltGran appears to be a company involved in construction (Būvniecība) and wood processing/granules (Kokmateriāli/Granulas). The website offers navigation to these two main service areas.

Key Services:
Construction servicesWood processingWood granules supply
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.74.196
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:226ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and layout, ensuring good mobile optimization. The HTML structure is valid and clean, but no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is likely moderate given the use of CDN-hosted Bootstrap assets. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML snippet. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags and no Open Graph or structured data present. Hosting provider and server details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website