Skip to main content

Is baltickidsmodels.com a Scam? Security Check Results - baltickidsmodels.com Reviews

B

Is baltickidsmodels.com Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if baltickidsmodels.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:14:28 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website baltickidsmodels.com currently serves a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page that blocks access until the visitor completes a CAPTCHA validation. No business-related content, contact information, or service descriptions are available on the page, indicating that the site is either under protection or potentially inactive. The domain is registered since 2019 with Wild West Domains, LLC, and DNSSEC is not enabled. The technical infrastructure reveals outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) embedded in the page metadata, which are known to have security vulnerabilities. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for bot mitigation and tracking, but lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which reduces its compliance posture. Overall, the site is not accessible for normal browsing without passing the CAPTCHA, limiting content and business analysis.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocking security page, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, or services can be extracted. The domain age is moderate and consistent with a small-scale or personal website. There are no contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of trust indicators, suggests low business credibility and professionalism. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, possibly due to prior abuse or attacks.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate due to the presence of a CAPTCHA challenge that helps mitigate automated bot traffic. However, the use of outdated CMS versions and absence of DNSSEC and security headers are significant weaknesses. No SSL/TLS configuration details are visible from the content, but the domain uses HTTPS as indicated by the URL. The site lacks privacy compliance mechanisms and incident response contact information. Overall, the security measures are basic and could be improved by upgrading software, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade the CMS to supported and secure versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a security challenge page requiring CAPTCHA validation to continue browsing. No business description or services are provided.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(566 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lv
ns2.areait.lv
ns3.areait.lv
MX Records:
0: baltickidsmodels.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073001, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:135ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are outdated and pose security risks. The page is primarily a security CAPTCHA challenge served by BitNinja, with embedded Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics scripts. The HTML is valid but minimal, with no advanced SEO or accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic, and performance is moderate due to external script loading. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks modern technical implementations such as security headers and DNSSEC, indicating technical debt and potential risks for business operations.
Analyze Another Website