Skip to main content

Is balticsecurity.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Baltic Security Foundation Reviews

balticsecurity.eu favicon

Is balticsecurity.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Baltic Security Foundation

Check if balticsecurity.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
Hugo 0.91.2Bootstrap 3.3.7FontAwesome 5.11.2jQuery 3.1.1Owl Carousel+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:09:55 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Baltic Security Foundation (BSF) is a small non-profit organization established in 2019, dedicated to promoting security and defense in the Baltic Sea region. It operates as a think tank and advocacy group, providing research, expert networking, and regional security initiatives. The foundation collaborates with recognized partners such as the Jamestown Foundation and the U.S. Embassy in Latvia, enhancing its credibility and influence within its niche market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting security experts, policymakers, and stakeholders interested in Baltic regional security. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and FontAwesome for styling and icons. It uses modern web technologies and is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. The site is hosted under a domain registered with Namecheap, Inc, and served over HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration. However, no advanced security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating areas for compliance improvement. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid baseline with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of security headers and privacy policies represents a moderate risk in terms of security posture and regulatory compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be enhanced to improve trust and readiness. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with minimal user tracking and no advertising or affiliate marketing. The overall risk is low, but strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response documentation are recommended to strengthen the foundation's digital security and regulatory posture.

Detected Technologies

Hugo 0.91.2Bootstrap 3.3.7FontAwesome 5.11.2jQuery 3.1.1Owl CarouselGoogle Fonts (Roboto)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

BSF occupies a specialized niche as a regional security non-profit focused on the Baltic Sea area. Its competitive advantage lies in its expert network, research output, and partnerships with established organizations. The business model is based on advocacy, research, and expert collaboration rather than commercial revenue streams. The foundation targets policymakers, security analysts, and academics interested in Baltic security issues. Growth indicators include recent publications, conferences, and active engagement with U.S. and European partners. The partnership ecosystem includes the Jamestown Foundation and U.S. Embassy support, enhancing legitimacy and reach. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital presence, improving compliance, and formalizing incident response capabilities to support sustainable growth and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@balticsecurity.eu

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Nodibinājums "Baltijas drošības fonds"

Registration Number:

40008288809

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented with excellent SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not documented, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The minimal use of third-party scripts reduces attack surface and tracking risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and response procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baltic Security Foundation

Description:

The Baltic Security Foundation (BSF), established in 2019, promotes the security and defense of the Baltic Sea region. It is a non-profit organization resulting from the Baltic Security Strategy Project (2017-2019) that gathers experts on defense, societal security, and economic security to assess shared challenges and recommend solutions. BSF provides a platform for discussion, research, expert networking, and mobility, advocating for stronger regional security in military and other areas.

Key Services:
Research and analysisExpert networking and mobilityConferences and publicationsAdvocacy for regional security
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Hugo 0.91.2Bootstrap 3.3.7FontAwesome 5.11.2jQuery 3.1.1Owl CarouselGoogle Fonts (Roboto)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a small non-profit.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

55/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1432-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.111.153, 185.199.108.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.110.153
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx2.privateemail.com
10: mx1.privateemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1665468790, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern static site generator (Hugo) combined with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and FontAwesome for UI components. It uses jQuery 3.1.1 and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome CDN. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain is registered with Namecheap, Inc. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks JSON-LD structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site could benefit from updated frameworks and improved accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Analyze Another Website