Skip to main content

Is baltijasburas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Baltijas Buras Reviews

B

Is baltijasburas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Baltijas Buras

Check if baltijasburas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceVisual ComposerjQueryBootstrap+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:04:25 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Baltijas Buras is a small Latvian business specializing in sailmaking and repair services, including new sail sewing and repairs for yachts, kites, and windsurfing sails. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Visual Composer, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity suitable for small businesses. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and presents relevant content clearly, though it lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on a niche market, but improvements in privacy compliance and security practices are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceVisual ComposerjQueryBootstrapFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Baltijas Buras operates in a niche market providing sailmaking and repair services primarily targeting individual sailors and small businesses in Latvia. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and experience, as indicated by the content. The website's use of WooCommerce suggests some e-commerce capabilities, possibly for selling related products or services. The company maintains a consistent brand presence online but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or customer testimonials. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit customer confidence and growth potential. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The WordPress CMS and plugins used are common but require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond standard WordPress components were detected, reducing privacy risks but also indicating limited user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baltijas Buras

Description:

Baltijas Buras provides sailmaking and repair services including new sail sewing, yacht, kite, and windsurfing sail repairs, as well as industrial sewing.

Key Services:
New sail sewingYacht sail repairKite repairWindsurfing sail repairIndustrial sewing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceVisual ComposerjQueryBootstrapFont Awesome
Frameworks:
WooCommerceVisual Composer
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.220.43.28 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.220.43.29
Name Servers:
ns.cloudhosting.lvDNS only
ns2.cloudhosting.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: baltijasburas.lv

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.220.43.28 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.21 with WooCommerce 3.4.8 and Visual Composer 21.0, indicating a moderately modern but somewhat dated technology stack. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Bootstrap 3.4.7 for frontend components. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts, with no third-party analytics or advertising scripts detected. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard SEO meta tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks but no advanced features. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website