Skip to main content

Is baltsdtd.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - baltsdtd.lv Reviews

baltsdtd.lv favicon

Is baltsdtd.lv Safe? Security Analysis for baltsdtd.lv – Gaisma un Tekstils

Check if baltsdtd.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Enfold Theme 7.1.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Open Sans)WP Emoji Support
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:33:11 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website baltsdtd.lv represents a small Latvian business specializing in lighting, textile design, and interior services. Their offerings include project development, consultations, lighting calculations, supply and installation of lighting fixtures, sewing, modeling, and project supervision. The site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with standard CMS infrastructure. The technical stack includes modern web fonts, jQuery, and standard WordPress plugins. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy policies. Contact information is not explicitly provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Enfold Theme 7.1.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Open Sans)WP Emoji Support

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets clients needing specialized lighting and textile design services, likely including architects, interior designers, and private customers in Latvia. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on project-based work and consultation. The website content and structure suggest a small enterprise with a local/regional market position. The absence of contact details and certifications limits trust signals. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and offers a clear set of services, but lacks digital marketing and analytics integration. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found exposed in the HTML. The cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating some level of GDPR awareness, but no privacy policy or incident response contacts are provided. The site lacks a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure information, which are best practices for transparency and incident management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional controls and documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website presents a business focused on lighting (apgaismojums), textile design (tekstiildizains), and interior (interjers) services. They offer project development, consultations, lighting calculations, delivery and installation of lighting fixtures, sewing, modeling, assembly, and project supervision. They also mention lectures and appreciation for project participation.

Key Services:
Lighting project developmentConsultationsLighting calculationsLighting fixture supplyInstallationProject supervisionTextile design and sewingInterior consultations and material selection
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Enfold Theme 7.1.1jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Open Sans)WP Emoji Support
Frameworks:
Avia Framework
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.248.90.72
Name Servers:
ns3.devlat.euDNS only
ns4.devlat.euDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail1.devlat.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025011900, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Enfold theme version 7.1.1, using the Avia Framework. It loads Google Fonts asynchronously and uses jQuery 3.7.1. The site is mobile responsive and uses lazy loading for images, contributing to moderate performance. No advanced analytics or marketing tools were detected. The site lacks explicit SEO meta tags beyond basic title and robots directives. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Analyze Another Website