Skip to main content

Is bandcamp.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Bandcamp Reviews

bandcamp.com favicon

Is bandcamp.com Safe? Security Analysis for Bandcamp

https://bandcamp.com

Check if bandcamp.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Stateslarge
Stripe (payment processing)Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA EnterpriseVue.js (frontend framework)Vite (build tool)+2 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:26:25 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bandcamp is a well-established online music marketplace and platform founded in 2003, focused on enabling independent artists to sell music and merchandise directly to fans. It holds a strong market position as a leading platform for music discovery, digital and physical sales, and community engagement through editorial content and live events. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging modern web technologies such as Vue.js, Stripe for payments, and Google services for analytics and bot protection. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration, and cookie consent mechanisms, although there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure programs. Overall, Bandcamp presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly digital presence with high content quality and strong business credibility.

Detected Technologies

Stripe (payment processing)Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA EnterpriseVue.js (frontend framework)Vite (build tool)GoDaddy (domain registrar)Google Cloud DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bandcamp operates in the media and e-commerce sectors, targeting music fans and independent artists globally. Its business model centers on direct-to-artist sales of digital music and physical merchandise, supplemented by editorial content and live streaming events to enhance user engagement. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its community-driven approach, transparent artist support, and diverse product offerings including vinyl, CDs, cassettes, and apparel. Revenue streams include sales commissions and possibly promotional partnerships. The company shows growth indicators through active editorial updates and live event features. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors like Stripe and cloud hosting providers. Strategic observations highlight Bandcamp's niche focus on independent music and its strong brand consistency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Bandcamp exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse, and cookie consent for privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program represents a compliance gap. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which could enhance DNS security. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by formalizing and publishing security governance documents and contact channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bandcamp

Description:

Discover amazing music and directly support the artists who make it.

Key Services:
Digital music salesPhysical merchandise sales (vinyl, CDs, cassettes, T-shirts)Music discovery by genre and locationEditorial content and music journalismLive streaming and listening parties
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Stripe (payment processing)Google Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA EnterpriseVue.js (frontend framework)Vite (build tool)GoDaddy (domain registrar)Google Cloud DNS
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment processing (Stripe)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and dynamic features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:smtp.app.echomark.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1120-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarcreports@bandcamp.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(116 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.65.91, 151.101.193.91, 151.101.1.91, 151.101.129.91
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:57ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:smtp.app.echomark.com ~all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js for frontend, Stripe for payment processing, and Google services for analytics and bot protection. Hosting appears to be on Google Cloud infrastructure with DNS managed via Google Cloud DNS. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and accessible with good SEO practices. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. The use of modulepreload and async script loading indicates attention to performance optimization. The absence of a common CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform tailored to Bandcamp's specific needs. Technical risks are minimal but include the lack of DNSSEC and limited visible security headers which could be improved.
Analyze Another Website