Skip to main content

Is barabanga.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - barabanga.lv Reviews

B

Is barabanga.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if barabanga.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:31:31 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website barabanga.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or suspicious visitors before granting access. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security service, limiting direct content access and analysis. The page content is minimal and focused solely on visitor validation, with no visible business or contact information. The technical infrastructure includes legacy CMS references (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal) and modern tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Security measures include the use of Google reCAPTCHA v2, but no visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits further restricts legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, limiting comprehensive evaluation.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security challenge page and lack of accessible content, no clear business information, market positioning, or operational insights can be derived. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja, a security service, which may indicate a focus on cybersecurity or hosting protection. No contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service are present, limiting trust and credibility signals. The presence of multiple language translations suggests an intent to serve a broad international audience, but no direct business model or sector information is available.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated bot access, which is a strong security control. However, the lack of visible security headers, unclear SSL/TLS configuration, and absence of privacy or cookie policies indicate gaps in comprehensive security and compliance posture. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 is a positive control against bots. The inability to access WHOIS data and lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information further limit security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but incomplete due to limited accessible data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly expose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access until CAPTCHA is solved.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitors are not automated bots before allowing access to the requested content.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to block suspicious IPs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: barabanga.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073005, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:131ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website references legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal) in metadata, which may indicate outdated infrastructure or placeholder content. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts shows integration of modern tracking and analytics tools. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The page is minimalistic, serving primarily as a security challenge, which impacts performance and user experience positively by limiting content load but negatively by blocking access. No hosting provider or SSL details are discernible from the content. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility but lacks SEO best practices and modern technical enhancements.
Analyze Another Website