Skip to main content

Is bazaarbakery.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Bazaar Bakery Reviews

bazaarbakery.com favicon

Is bazaarbakery.com Safe? Security Analysis for Bazaar Bakery

Check if bazaarbakery.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle AnalyticsCleanTalk Anti-Spam+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:22:30 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bazaar Bakery is a small local bakery business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in affordable and high-quality baked goods including pastries, cakes, and rolls. The website showcases their product offerings with detailed descriptions and images, targeting general consumers looking for fresh bakery products. The business appears newly established in 2023, consistent with the domain registration date. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating Google Analytics and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures, though some HTTP security headers are missing and DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages. Contact is provided via a web form without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for a small retail bakery but could improve privacy transparency and security headers.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle AnalyticsCleanTalk Anti-SpamCookieYes Cookie Consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bazaar Bakery operates in the retail sector focusing on bakery and confectionery products. Their business model centers on direct sales of baked goods with an option for customers to place orders via a contact form. The company targets local consumers in Riga seeking quality pastries at affordable prices. The website content and structured data indicate a consistent brand presence with clear product offerings. The lack of direct contact details and limited privacy documentation suggests a small-scale operation possibly in early growth stages. Integration with Google Analytics and cookie consent tools shows awareness of digital marketing and compliance needs. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business is positioned as a niche local bakery with potential for expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured ensuring encrypted communications. The use of CleanTalk anti-spam plugin and CookieYes cookie consent indicates proactive measures against spam and privacy compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and missing HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are not published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small retail website but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bazaar Bakery

Description:

Beķereja Rīgā par pieejamām cenām un lieliskām garšu kombinācijām. Siltas ceptas maizītes no kārtainās mīklās, izslavēti Limoncello kruasāni un iespējams labākā biezpienmaize Rīgā.

Key Services:
Bakery productsPastry salesCustom orders via contact form
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle AnalyticsCleanTalk Anti-SpamCookieYes Cookie Consent
Frameworks:
WooCommerceElementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small local bakery e-commerce site with product listings and ordering form.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: FXNWBACB23EEQQA3D36N7YBBHJWFZLWZYHSHMXS5TORQ67ALHKNA.MX-VERIFICATION.GOOGLE.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(338 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.243
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lv
ns2.nano.lv
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.com
15: FXNWBACB23EEQQA3D36N7YBBHJWFZLWZYHSHMXS5TORQ67ALHKNA.MX-VERIFICATION.GOOGLE.com
SOA:Serial: 2024072601, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:193ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and marketing analytics. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management with detailed category controls. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs and uses standard web fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some animations and images optimized for different screen sizes. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses CleanTalk anti-spam to protect forms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy documentation.
Analyze Another Website