Skip to main content

Is bbpress.org a Scam? Security Check Results - DNStination, Inc. Reviews

D

Is bbpress.org Safe? Security Analysis for DNStination, Inc.

Check if bbpress.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 10:14:18 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

bbPress.org is a well-established open source forum software project created by the WordPress community. It provides forum software integrated tightly with WordPress, targeting developers, site administrators, and community managers who want to add discussion forums to their WordPress sites. The website serves as a hub for downloads, documentation, and community support forums, positioning itself as a niche leader in WordPress forum solutions. The business model revolves around open source software distribution and community engagement rather than direct commercial sales. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with standard web technologies including PHP and jQuery. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, typical for a content-rich WordPress site. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but domain registration is managed by a reputable registrar. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, and no cookie consent mechanism is present despite a comprehensive privacy policy linked from WordPress.org. These gaps suggest room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional with a strong community focus. The domain age and WHOIS data support legitimacy. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and implementing cookie consent to enhance compliance and security maturity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

bbPress.org operates within the WordPress ecosystem as a specialized open source forum software provider. Its market positioning is strong within the WordPress community, leveraging the popularity of WordPress to reach developers and site owners needing forum functionality. The business model is community-driven and open source, relying on voluntary contributions and community support rather than direct monetization. The target audience includes WordPress developers, site administrators, and community managers. The project benefits from partnerships with WordPress.org and BuddyPress.org, enhancing its ecosystem integration. Growth indicators include active forums and recent posts. The lack of direct commercial contact details suggests a non-commercial or community-supported operation. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining strong community engagement and improving security and privacy compliance to sustain trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of bbPress.org is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. The lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present, which may raise privacy compliance concerns. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in DNS security, HTTP headers, and privacy controls are recommended to enhance the security maturity and compliance posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

DNStination, Inc.

Description:

Forum software from the creators of WordPress. Asynchronous discussion, user profiles, subscriptions, and more.

Key Services:
Forum softwareCommunity support forumsDocumentation and developer resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based community forum software project site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:wordpress.org -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:0bqp2jnw@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:0bqp2jnw@fr.dmarcian.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

37/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(163 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:198.143.164.252
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.org
ns2.wordpress.org
ns3.wordpress.org
ns4.wordpress.org
MX Records:
0: mail.wordpress.org
SOA:Serial: 2004100626, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:wordpress.org -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using PHP and jQuery, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. The HTML is well structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and scripts loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive design principles. Hosting details are not explicit, but domain registration is managed by MarkMonitor Inc., a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate, typical for a WordPress site with community forums. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security controls.
Analyze Another Website