Skip to main content

Is bcline.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Baltic Consol Line Reviews

bcline.eu favicon

Is bcline.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Baltic Consol Line

Check if bcline.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLithuaniamedium
WordPress 6.0.9PHPGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)Slider RevolutionVisual Composer (WPBakery)+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:33:36 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Baltic Consol Line is a well-established logistics and freight consolidator company operating primarily in the Baltic States and surrounding regions. Founded in 2012, the company specializes in neutral consolidation services across air, rail, road, and sea freight, complemented by cargo insurance offerings. Their target audience includes forwarding, transport, logistics, and customs brokerage companies, emphasizing neutrality and secure handling of client information. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions and multiple physical office locations across Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, and Turkey. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Visual Composer and Slider Revolution, and integrates Google Analytics via MonsterInsights. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, but there is a lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced HTTP security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital presence with good business credibility and privacy compliance. However, improvements in security transparency and incident response readiness would enhance trust and resilience. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and consistency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.0.9PHPGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)Slider RevolutionVisual Composer (WPBakery)jQueryMediaElement.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Baltic Consol Line holds a strong market position as the largest neutral consolidator in the Baltic region, leveraging a wide partner network to offer comprehensive freight services. Their business model focuses on neutrality and trust, catering exclusively to professional logistics and forwarding companies. The company’s growth since 2012 indicates stable operations and regional expansion, supported by multiple offices. The website content and structure suggest a focus on B2B services with an emphasis on reliability and partnership. The absence of direct sales or e-commerce features aligns with their service-oriented model. The company’s marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics for user insights and a Facebook presence for social engagement. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced security policies and incident response frameworks to align with industry best practices and regulatory expectations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting GDPR compliance awareness. The use of Google Analytics includes opt-out mechanisms, indicating respect for user privacy. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files reveals gaps in transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site could benefit from implementing standard HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web threats. The lack of visible contact channels for security incidents may delay response times in case of breaches. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a business website but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and resilience standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baltic Consol Line

Description:

Baltic Consol Line is a neutral consolidator providing freight and logistics services including air, rail, road, and sea freight, as well as cargo insurance. The company serves forwarding, transport, logistics, and customs brokerage companies, guaranteeing neutrality and secure handling of customer information.

Key Services:
Air freightRail freightRoad freightSea freightCargo insurance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.0.9PHPGoogle Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)Slider RevolutionVisual Composer (WPBakery)jQueryMediaElement.js
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced with forceSSL in Google Analytics config
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Opt-out function for Google Analytics tracking

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional logistics and freight consolidator site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com include:aspmx.pardot.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:development@bcline.eu
Forensic Reports:development@bcline.eu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:79.98.26.19
Name Servers:
ns1.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns2.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns3.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns4.serveriai.ltDNS only
MX Records:
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2024090200, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:134ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com include:aspmx.pardot.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using popular plugins such as Visual Composer and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. The integration of Google Analytics via MonsterInsights provides robust visitor tracking and data collection capabilities. The site uses jQuery and MediaElement.js for interactive and media features. Performance is moderate with some full-width video backgrounds and image assets that may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and font scaling. SEO is supported through meta tags, hreflang attributes for multilingual support, and structured navigation menus. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and the absence of advanced security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicit, which could be clarified for better infrastructure transparency.
Analyze Another Website