Skip to main content

Is beaverbuild.org a Scam? Security Check Results - beaverbuild.org Reviews

B

Is beaverbuild.org Safe? Security Analysis for beaverbuild

Check if beaverbuild.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyFrancesmall
HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:45:26 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Beaverbuild.org is a small technology project focused on decentralized block building principles, emphasizing decentralization, uncensorability, and neutrality. The website provides minimal content, including a link to an RPC endpoint and documentation, targeting developers or users interested in blockchain or decentralized technologies. The domain is registered in France with a reputable registrar, consistent with the website's technical hosting. Technically, the website is a simple static HTML and CSS site with no detected CMS, frameworks, or advanced technologies. It lacks modern SEO optimization, accessibility features, and performance enhancements but is functional and moderately optimized for mobile. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain registration is transparent and legitimate, but the site could improve its security posture by enabling DNSSEC, adding HTTPS security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with basic technical implementation and limited business information. Strategic improvements in security and compliance documentation would enhance trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The project appears to be a niche decentralized technology initiative with a focus on blockchain or distributed ledger technology. Its market positioning is unclear due to minimal content, but it likely targets developers and blockchain enthusiasts. The business model is not explicit but may be community-driven or open-source. The use of a riseup.net email suggests a privacy-conscious or activist orientation. There are no visible revenue streams, partnerships, or certifications. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@riseup.net

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in compliance and best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for enhanced domain security. The site uses HTTPS (implied by the URL), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture requires improvement to meet industry standards and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website promotes a philosophy of block building that is decentralised, uncensorable, and neutral. It references a URL endpoint (https://rpc.beaverbuild.org/) and provides links to documentation and a text file named buildernet.txt. The content is minimal and abstract, focusing on principles rather than detailed business descriptions.

Key Services:
Decentralized block buildingRPC endpoint serviceDocumentation provision
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and abstract, focusing on decentralization principles.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
email

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(408 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.252.29, 3.33.230.164
Name Servers:
ns-67-c.gandi.net
ns-88-b.gandi.net
ns-90-a.gandi.net
SOA:Serial: 1756944000, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:226ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using basic HTML5 and CSS3 without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting is provided by Gandi SAS, a reputable French registrar and hosting provider. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies, but modernization opportunities include adding responsive design improvements, SEO metadata, and accessibility enhancements. The absence of analytics and tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights.
Analyze Another Website