Skip to main content

Is bellanapoli.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Bella Napoli Reviews

bellanapoli.lv favicon

Is bellanapoli.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Bella Napoli

Check if bellanapoli.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
React (Next.js)Google Fonts (Roboto)Swiper.jsGoogle Maps EmbedSentry (error tracking)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:19:05 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bella Napoli is a small hospitality business specializing in authentic Italian pizza delivery, takeaway, and reservation services based in Riga, Latvia. The company emphasizes gourmet ingredients and traditional preparation methods, positioning itself as a premium pizza provider with strong customer satisfaction and recognition in European pizza rankings. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, providing a smooth user experience with comprehensive menu details and ordering options. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and error monitoring via Sentry, though some security headers are missing. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the business demonstrates a credible online presence with strong branding and customer trust, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration transparency.

Detected Technologies

React (Next.js)Google Fonts (Roboto)Swiper.jsGoogle Maps EmbedSentry (error tracking)ChoiceQR platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bella Napoli targets pizza enthusiasts and food lovers in Riga, offering a curated menu of Italian dishes with a focus on quality and authenticity. The business model includes direct online ordering, delivery, and table reservations, supported by integrations with delivery providers like Wolt. The company leverages social proof through high ratings and listings on platforms like TripAdvisor and 50 TOP Pizza Europe. Marketing tools include Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and retargeting. The business operates in the hospitality sector with a small size profile, focusing on local market penetration and customer experience enhancement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@bellanapoli.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712881****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Use of Sentry indicates proactive error monitoring. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms appear secure with standard input fields for ordering and contact. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting regulatory compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bella Napoli

Description:

The epitome of exceptional Pizza in Riga. Our passion revolves around crafting gourmet pizzas that elevate your taste buds to new heights. With a commitment to authenticity, Bella Napoli boasts real Italian chefs who infuse their expertise into every pizza, creating a culinary masterpiece that defines our unique identity.

Key Services:
Pizza deliveryTakeawayTable reservationOnline orderingPre-orderFeedback collection
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (Next.js)Google Fonts (Roboto)Swiper.jsGoogle Maps EmbedSentry (error tracking)ChoiceQR platform
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: x2ge5cvufh45adruczyff3b7dmcpbgwpguzs4nphja5f36f6edyq.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:34.90.155.120
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
15: x2ge5cvufh45adruczyff3b7dmcpbgwpguzs4nphja5f36f6edyq.mx-verification.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1728896704, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:117ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring good performance and SEO. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The site integrates Google Maps for location display and uses ChoiceQR platform services for menu and ordering functionalities. Performance is moderate with optimized images and preloading strategies. Mobile optimization is good, and the site includes cookie consent and privacy management features. There is no detected CMS beyond the custom ChoiceQR platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital presence.
Analyze Another Website