Skip to main content

Is benvenusa.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Benvenusa Reviews

benvenusa.com favicon

Is benvenusa.com Safe? Security Analysis for Benvenusa

Check if benvenusa.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherNew Zealandsmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPlyr video player+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:13:12 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Benvenusa is a small, specialized business representing artisanal micro wine producers primarily from Italy and Slovenia. Founded in 2023 by experienced wine industry professionals, the company focuses on niche, hand-harvested vineyards and offers a curated portfolio of wines. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting wine enthusiasts and distributors interested in high-quality, small-batch wines. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. It is hosted via GoDaddy with SSL enabled, ensuring secure connections. However, the site lacks key compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies and does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR and other privacy regulations. Security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, allowing full content analysis.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPlyr video playerSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Benvenusa operates in the niche artisanal wine sector, leveraging the founders' established reputation and experience in the wine industry. The business model centers on representing and distributing micro producers, focusing on quality and regional authenticity. The target market includes wine connoisseurs and distributors seeking unique, small-scale wines. The company’s digital presence is professional but limited in compliance transparency. There is no evidence of extensive partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of Google Analytics suggests an interest in tracking visitor behavior for marketing insights. The business is positioned as a boutique, high-quality wine portfolio with a focus on regions like Friuli Venezia Giulia, Tuscany, Slovenia, and Sicily.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@benvenusa.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present, minimizing attack surface. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no cookie consent mechanism, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, privacy compliance documents, and a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR and privacy regulation compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Benvenusa

Description:

Represents a small portfolio of artisanal, truly micro wine producers from Friuli Venezia Giulia, Slovenia, Tuscany, and Sicily. Founded by Bobby Stuckey MS and Lachlan Mackinnon-Patterson, with a passion for Friuli Venezia Giulia region and experience from their wine company Scarpetta.

Key Services:
Representation of micro wine producersDistribution network for wines
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerPlyr video playerSwiper.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:170.64.149.227
Name Servers:
ns27.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns28.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024112500, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, including libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Plyr for video playback. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and optimized media assets. Accessibility is basic but present, with focus outlines and semantic HTML elements. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of compliance documents, which could impact regulatory adherence and security posture.
Analyze Another Website