Is berghof-fluoroplastics.com Safe? Security Analysis for Berghof Fluoroplastic Technology GmbH
Check if berghof-fluoroplastics.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Berghof Fluoroplastic Technology GmbH operates as a specialized manufacturer and supplier of innovative fluoroplastic materials, particularly PTFE-based products. The company positions itself as a technology leader and innovation partner serving diverse industrial sectors including automotive, semiconductor, laboratory, photonics, and medical life sciences. The website reflects a professional B2B business model focused on material solutions and research and development. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, and uses Matomo analytics with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with encrypted communications and privacy controls, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is well-designed, content-rich, and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security policies.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company is part of the Berghof Group, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a focused manufacturing niche in fluoroplastics. Its market positioning as a technology leader suggests competitive advantages in innovation and quality. The business model centers on supplying advanced material solutions to industrial clients, supported by research and development capabilities. The website's multilingual support and social media presence indicate efforts to engage international and professional audiences. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and custom solutions in specialized sectors. The partnership ecosystem includes the parent Berghof Group and possibly other industrial collaborators. Strategic observations highlight a strong brand identity and consistent messaging but reveal opportunities to improve transparency and security communication.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent for analytics, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content or scripts. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adding explicit security policies, headers, and incident contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Berghof Fluoroplastic Technology GmbH
Ihr Spezialist für innovative Produkte und Materiallösungen aus Polytetrafluorethylen.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Matomo with cookie consent requirement
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings