Skip to main content

Is bestcontenthosting.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bestcontenthosting.com Reviews

B

Is bestcontenthosting.com Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if bestcontenthosting.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:26:14 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website bestcontenthosting.com currently presents a security verification page employing Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot protection mechanism. This blocks direct access to the site's actual content, preventing a full analysis of business offerings or user-facing features. The domain is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. since 2021 and is set to expire in 2025, showing a consistent registration history without privacy protection. The technical infrastructure is minimal, focusing on bot mitigation with Bootstrap for styling and Google reCAPTCHA for security verification. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor is there any visible contact or business information on the landing page. This limits the ability to assess compliance or business credibility. Security posture shows some best practices with reCAPTCHA usage but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers. Overall, the site appears to be in a protective mode, possibly to prevent abuse or scraping, but this restricts transparency and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked behind a security verification page, no direct business information, services, or market positioning can be determined. The domain name suggests a content hosting service, but no explicit business model, target audience, or partnerships are visible. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive for legitimacy. The lack of contact details and policies reduces business credibility and trust signals. No social media or external business links are present to infer partnerships or ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated access, indicating a moderate security maturity level focused on bot protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and visible HTTPS enforcement reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. The domain WHOIS data is public and consistent, which supports legitimacy but does not compensate for the lack of transparency on the site itself.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge with Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating a WAF or bot protection mechanism blocking direct content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot verification

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1288-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.bestcontenthosting.com
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/13/2025 (74 days)
SANs:*.bestcontenthosting.com, bestcontenthosting.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(18 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.159
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::159
Name Servers:
ns1.stackdns.com
ns2.stackdns.com
ns3.stackdns.com
ns4.stackdns.com
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1676708912, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:242ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a security verification page, lacking substantive content or metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Hosting provider details are limited to the domain registrar Tucows Domains Inc. Performance and SEO optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking. Mobile optimization is basic, with responsive meta viewport tag and Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is minimal with some ARIA roles and visually hidden elements for screen readers. Overall, the technical implementation is focused on security verification rather than content delivery.
Analyze Another Website