Skip to main content

Is bestdoors.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA DOVGIL Reviews

bestdoors.lv favicon

Is bestdoors.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA DOVGIL

Check if bestdoors.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
BootstrapAnimate.cssAOS (Animate On Scroll)BoxiconsGlightbox+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:30:24 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA DOVGIL is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing and authorized distribution of door products including interior doors, exterior doors, technical doors, and door accessories. The company targets Latvian customers seeking quality door solutions and partners with multiple reputable door manufacturers primarily from Poland. The website reflects a small-sized business with a clear focus on retail and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, Animate.css, and AOS for animations, delivering a responsive and visually appealing user experience. However, the absence of a CMS or advanced analytics tools suggests a relatively simple infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapAnimate.cssAOS (Animate On Scroll)BoxiconsGlightboxSwiperGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sector, focusing on door products. Its business model combines manufacturing and authorized distribution, leveraging partnerships with multiple European door manufacturers. The presence of leasing service links indicates additional revenue streams. The target market is local Latvian customers and businesses requiring door solutions. The website's partner ecosystem is strong, featuring several well-known door brands, which enhances credibility. Growth indicators include a diverse product range and active social media presence. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and professional content, supporting moderate market positioning within its niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@bestdoors.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712019****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. No forms were detected on the analyzed page, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness to align with best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA DOVGIL

Description:

Mūsu izstrādājumu klāstā ir iekšdurvis, ārdurvis, tehniskās durvis un durvju piederumi.

Key Services:
Interior doorsExterior doorsTechnical doorsDoor accessoriesLeasing organization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapAnimate.cssAOS (Animate On Scroll)BoxiconsGlightboxSwiperGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.237.98.22
Name Servers:
ns1.noc.lvDNS only
ns2.noc.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: bestdoors.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062501, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.237.98.22 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Animate.css and AOS for animations, and Google Fonts for typography. The site loads multiple vendor CSS and JS files from its own domain, indicating self-hosted assets. No CMS or server-side technologies were detected from the HTML source. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive layout. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Analyze Another Website