Skip to main content

Is bettergambling.co.za a Scam? Security Check Results - Sazeni-On-line Reviews

bettergambling.co.za favicon

Is bettergambling.co.za Safe? Security Analysis for Sazeni-On-line

Check if bettergambling.co.za is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherSouth Africasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:44:16 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BetterGambling.co.za is an online platform specializing in comprehensive reviews of online casinos, games, and bonuses, primarily targeting the South African market. The business operates as an affiliate marketing site, providing detailed information and recommendations to adult gamblers seeking trustworthy casino options. The company behind the site is identified as Sazeni-On-line, founded in 2020 and based in Prague, Czech Republic, which suggests an international operational structure despite the South African focus. The website features a professional design with good content quality and clear navigation, supported by structured data and active social media channels.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The platform positions itself as a niche player in the online gambling review sector, leveraging affiliate partnerships with various online casinos. It offers categorized casino reviews, bonus guides, and payment method information, catering to adult users interested in gambling. The presence of multiple alternate domains for different countries indicates a strategy to capture diverse international markets. However, the lack of transparent WHOIS data and registrant mismatch may affect perceived legitimacy. The business model relies on affiliate commissions and advertising, with growth potential tied to the expanding online gambling industry in South Africa and beyond.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better compliance and security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sazeni-On-line

Description:

Utilize our comprehensive reviews to find the top online casinos. Learn about games, bonuses, and safe ways to make payments.

Key Services:
Casino reviewsGame informationBonus offersPayment method guides
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSwiper.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional online casino review platform targeting South African and international users.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bettergambling.co.za
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/14/2025 (74 days)
SANs:bettergambling.co.za, www.bettergambling.co.za

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(326 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.119.85
AAAA Records:2a01:28:ca:112::1:802
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.cz
ns1.regzone.de
ns1.regzone.info
SOA:Serial: 2025061104, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern JavaScript libraries including Swiper.js for UI components and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing script loading and caching. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy technical implementations.
Analyze Another Website