Skip to main content

Is bettergambling.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Sazeni-On-line Reviews

bettergambling.eu favicon

Is bettergambling.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Sazeni-On-line

Check if bettergambling.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaCzech Republicmedium
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Swiper.js
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 4:31:39 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BetterGambling.eu is an independent media platform focused on providing transparent and fair reviews of gambling operators, including casinos and sportsbooks, primarily targeting the Czech and broader European markets. The company, operating under the brand Sazeni-On-line, positions itself as a trusted source for bettors and casino enthusiasts, emphasizing unbiased content and a rigorous 100-point rating methodology. Their business model revolves around affiliate marketing, B2B partnerships, and content publishing, with a strong presence across multiple international markets and languages. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security, and Swiper.js for interactive content. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling, although some security headers are not explicitly detected. From a security and compliance perspective, the site shows good privacy compliance with GDPR indicators, cookie consent mechanisms, and a privacy policy. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this industry, and does not raise immediate trust concerns given the professional site content and transparency. Overall, BetterGambling.eu presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured platform with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and WHOIS data availability could further enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Swiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

BetterGambling.eu holds a strong market position as the largest Czech and EU hub for gambling reviews, targeting bettors and casino players with high-quality, unbiased content. Their competitive advantage lies in their transparent rating methodology, refusal to sell ratings, and extensive localization across 20+ language versions. Revenue streams include affiliate commissions, sponsored reviews, and B2B partnerships offering services like branded articles, email marketing, localization, and podcast integration. The company demonstrates growth through organic traffic exceeding 30 million visits annually and a monthly player value of 16,000 EUR. Their partnership ecosystem includes well-known affiliates and gambling operators, enhancing their market reach and credibility. The business model is content-driven with a focus on long-term organic growth and trust-building within the gambling community.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits external reporting of security issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sazeni-On-line

Description:

We are Sázení Online – the largest CZ/EU hub for bettors and casino enthusiasts, where truth and fair reviews win over marketing glitter.

Key Services:
Casino and sportsbook reviewsSponsored reviews and branded articlesEmailing and notificationsLocalization and link-buildingSocial and podcast integrationAffiliate models and reporting
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v3Swiper.js
Frameworks:
Custom JavaScript framework/store pattern
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission with CSRF tokens

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics 4
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing Tools:
Email newslettersSmart notifications
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bettergambling.eu
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:10/8/2025 (68 days)
SANs:bettergambling.eu, www.bettergambling.eu

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.119.85
AAAA Records:2a01:28:ca:112::1:802
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.czDNS only
ns1.regzone.deDNS only
ns1.regzone.infoDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072502, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:372ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with custom state management and interactive UI components powered by Swiper.js. Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA v3 are integrated for analytics and security. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking issues detected. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities to enhance security headers and monitoring.
Analyze Another Website