Skip to main content

Is betteruptime.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Better Stack, Inc. Reviews

betteruptime.com favicon

Is betteruptime.com Safe? Security Analysis for Better Stack, Inc.

Check if betteruptime.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
Vue.jsPiniaStimulusTurbo RailsSentry+8 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:20:39 AM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Better Stack, Inc. is a technology company founded in 2013 that provides an AI-native platform for on-call and incident response, including uptime monitoring, incident management, status pages, tracing, infrastructure monitoring, and log management. Positioned as a competitive alternative to established players like PagerDuty and Pingdom, Better Stack targets engineering teams and SaaS companies with a SaaS subscription model offering both free and enterprise tiers. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency, supported by customer testimonials and reputable client logos. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Ruby on Rails, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, with good SEO and accessibility practices. Security is robust with HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and use of Sentry for error monitoring, although DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit cookie consent is missing. The security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of a published vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts are areas for improvement. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, Better Stack presents a mature and secure digital presence with room for enhanced privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms, publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, and providing clear incident response contact information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Vue.jsPiniaStimulusTurbo RailsSentryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelTwitter AdsLinkedIn Insight TagReddit PixelBing UETPlausible AnalyticsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Better Stack operates in the technology sector, focusing on monitoring and incident management solutions for engineering teams and SaaS providers. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating multiple services into a single platform with AI-driven incident silencing and flexible escalation policies. The business model is subscription-based with a free tier to attract users and enterprise plans for larger customers. The company has established partnerships within its ecosystem, including related domains like betteruptime.com and logtail.com. Growth indicators include extensive marketing and analytics integration, active community engagement, and a clear focus on customer experience. The company maintains a strong market presence with consistent branding and professional content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@betterstack.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+1628900****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of security headers, CSRF tokens, and error monitoring via Sentry. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and modern frameworks are used with no known vulnerable libraries detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. Incident response readiness is not explicitly communicated, which could impact trust in security incident handling. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Better Stack, Inc.

Description:

AI-native platform for on-call and incident response with effortless monitoring, status pages, tracing, infrastructure monitoring and log management.

Key Services:
Uptime monitoringIncident managementStatus pagesTracingInfrastructure monitoringLog managementAI incident silencing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.jsPiniaStimulusTurbo RailsSentryGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelTwitter AdsLinkedIn Insight TagReddit PixelBing UETPlausible AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Platforms:
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)Better Stack own hosting
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for inline scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)Plausible AnalyticsPostHogLinkedIn Insight TagFacebook PixelTwitter AnalyticsBing UETReddit Pixel
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsBing AdsTwitter AdsFacebook AdsLinkedIn AdsReddit Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagTwitter PixelReddit PixelBing UETPlausible AnalyticsPostHog
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot FormsPostHog
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website offers a comprehensive uptime monitoring and incident management platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:78ada66085894fde8807ebb4d1da1aec@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:betterstack.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/16/2025 (74 days)
SANs:betterstack.com, mcp.betterstack.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(173 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.40.94, 172.66.43.162
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3108::ac42:2ba2, 2606:4700:3108::ac42:285e
Name Servers:
haley.ns.cloudflare.com
keenan.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379383568, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:54ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js for frontend, Ruby on Rails backend (implied), and uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and PostHog. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts, lazy loading images, and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of DNSSEC and explicit privacy consent mechanisms are noted. The infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience aligned with business goals.
Analyze Another Website