Skip to main content

Is betting-on-line.us a Scam? Security Check Results - Sazeni-On-line Reviews

betting-on-line.us favicon

Is betting-on-line.us Safe? Security Analysis for Sazeni-On-line

Check if betting-on-line.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG graphicsCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:50:03 AM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BettingOnline.us is a specialized informational website focused on providing comprehensive reviews and guides about online sportsbooks targeting the US market. The site offers detailed bookmaker reviews, bonus information, and gambling help content, supported by a small but engaged user base and a professional presentation. The business is operated by Sazeni-On-line, a Czech Republic based entity founded in 2020, with a clear focus on the gambling affiliate and informational niche. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and Google Tag Manager for analytics, delivering a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust somewhat, but the site maintains consistent branding and trust signals. Overall, the site is a moderately trustworthy resource for adult users interested in US online betting.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG graphicsCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche in the online gambling affiliate and informational sector, targeting US bettors with localized content. It leverages affiliate marketing through bookmaker reviews and bonus promotions, supported by a newsletter and social media presence. The business model relies on content-driven user engagement and partnerships with bookmakers. The site shows growth potential with 30,000 monthly readers and a community focus. Its partnership ecosystem includes related gambling sites in Europe and other regions. The company operates independently without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The site’s content and marketing approach are professional and consistent, positioning it as a credible player in the online betting information market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure form handling including CSRF tokens, and a cookie consent mechanism. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for an informational site but with room for improvement in formal security policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sazeni-On-line

Description:

With the help of our thorough reviews, find the top US bookmakers online. Learn about odds, betting markets, and safe ways to make payments.

Key Services:
Bookmaker reviewsBonuses and promotions informationGambling help and education contentNewsletter subscription
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG graphicsCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Newsletter subscription form
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(109 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.119.85
Name Servers:
ns1.thinline.cz
ns2.thinline.cz
ns3.cesky-hosting.eu
SOA:Serial: 20234035, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with reactive state management, SVG icons, and responsive CSS. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with no obvious technical debt or errors in the HTML. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website