Skip to main content

Is bettor-online.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Sazeni-On-line Reviews

bettor-online.uk favicon

Is bettor-online.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Sazeni-On-line

Check if bettor-online.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:34:18 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BettorOnline.uk is a specialized online platform providing comprehensive reviews and information about UK bookmakers, betting markets, and bonuses. The business operates as an affiliate/review site targeting adult bettors in the UK market, with a professional and content-rich website. The company behind the site is Sazeni-On-line, based in Prague, Czech Republic, founded in 2020. The site maintains a consistent brand presence and offers valuable content including gambling help articles and bonus guides. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the absence of CMS identification and hosting details limits deeper infrastructure insights. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies, which could be improved. The WHOIS data is missing and indicates domain registration issues, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional site content. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy from a content perspective but should address domain registration transparency and enhance security practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business positions itself as a niche player in the UK online betting review market, leveraging affiliate marketing and content to attract bettors seeking trustworthy bookmaker reviews and bonuses. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed reviews, a large user base, and a public community. The business model likely includes affiliate commissions from bookmakers. The company has a broad partnership ecosystem with related gambling sites across multiple regions, enhancing its market reach. Growth indicators include steady monthly readership and social media engagement. However, the lack of direct contact information and domain registration transparency could impact credibility. Strategic partnerships with other gambling information portals suggest a collaborative approach to market expansion.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The lack of direct security contact channels limits incident reporting capabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and improved transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sazeni-On-line

Description:

With the help of our thorough reviews, find the top UK bookmakers online. Learn about odds, betting markets, and safe ways to make payments.

Key Services:
Bookmaker reviewsBonuses informationBetting guidesGambling help articles
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerSVG iconsCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bettor-online.uk
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/24/2025 (54 days)
SANs:bettor-online.uk, www.bettor-online.uk

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(155 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.119.85
AAAA Records:2a01:28:ca:112::1:802
Name Servers:
ns1.regzone.czDNS only
ns1.regzone.deDNS only
ns1.regzone.infoDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2024122702, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:203ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, SVG icons, and responsive CSS. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and optimized images. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML and ARIA roles implied but not explicitly detailed. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a good user experience but has room for security and performance enhancements.
Analyze Another Website