Skip to main content

Is bgn.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Baltijas Grāmatvedības Nams Reviews

B

Is bgn.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Baltijas Grāmatvedības Nams

Check if bgn.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:06:22 AM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Baltijas Grāmatvedības Nams (BGN.LV) appears to be a small Latvian accounting or bookkeeping service provider targeting Latvian, Russian, and English-speaking audiences. The website content is minimal and primarily serves as a basic informational portal without interactive features or detailed business descriptions. The technical infrastructure is simple, relying on basic HTML and JavaScript with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or advanced frameworks, and the site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and absence of security headers or privacy policies. The lack of contact information and WHOIS transparency further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but outdated and lacking in critical security and compliance features.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the accounting sector within Latvia, likely serving local clients. The website's multilingual options indicate an intent to reach a broader regional audience. However, the lack of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains suggests a standalone small business. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of digital marketing awareness, but the lack of privacy compliance and cookie consent mechanisms is a gap. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to data interception risks. No security headers or incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited security governance. The site does not disclose privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No forms or input fields reduce the attack surface but also limit user engagement. The use of Google Analytics without clear privacy disclosures further complicates compliance. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security controls, privacy compliance, and transparency to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baltijas Grāmatvedības Nams

Description:

Baltijas Grāmatvedības Nams appears to be a business related to accounting or bookkeeping services in the Baltic region, based on the company name and content language.

Key Services:
AccountingBookkeeping
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.185 ip4:85.31.97.31 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.192/26 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: bgn.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072200, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:263ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.185 ip4:85.31.97.31 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.192/26 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using basic HTML and JavaScript, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which may affect usability and search engine rankings. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern best practices. The absence of HTTPS is a significant technical deficiency. No forms or interactive elements are present, limiting data collection capabilities. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is outdated and requires modernization to improve security, compliance, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website