Skip to main content

Is bi.bi a Scam? Security Check Results - BiBiPiano Reviews

B

Is bi.bi Safe? Security Analysis for BiBiPiano

Check if bi.bi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaBurundismall
WordPressjQueryCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:30:27 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

BiBiPiano is a small independent classical piano music creator and distributor, offering high-quality music downloads and sheet music primarily targeting Chinese-speaking music enthusiasts. The website is built on WordPress and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The technical infrastructure is moderate with Cloudflare DNS and a standard WordPress theme, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy for its niche but could improve security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a content creator platform focusing on classical and non-classical piano music, distributing free downloads under CC BY-NC 4.0 license. It targets music lovers who seek high-quality audio and sheet music. The business model is content sharing with a membership area for additional services. The site leverages popular Chinese and global video platforms for content distribution, indicating a hybrid online presence. The domain is privacy protected but stable and consistent with the business age. No direct commercial contact info or certifications are present, reflecting a small-scale personal brand rather than a corporate entity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, indicating basic domain security hygiene. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces resilience against certain attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent banner is present, which may be a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BiBiPiano

Description:

个人古典钢琴演奏家网站,提供音乐作品免费下载及乐谱分享,主打高品质无损音频和CC BY-NC 4.0授权,面向喜欢古典及非古典钢琴音乐的用户。

Key Services:
音乐作品下载乐谱分享会员专区服务
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
WordPress TwentyTwenty Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Site Kit by Google
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal music creator site focused on classical piano music.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:bi.bi
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/13/2025 (38 days)
SANs:bi.bi, *.bi.bi

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(315 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.138, 172.67.152.94
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::ac43:985e, 2606:4700:3036::6815:208a
Name Servers:
dean.ns.cloudflare.com
gail.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: bi-bi.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2378111261, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress 6.5.6 with the TwentyTwenty theme and jQuery library. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not use Cloudflare's WAF or DNSSEC. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design and SEO-friendly meta tags. Performance is moderate with some preloading of scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and skip links. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or headless CMS. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website