Skip to main content

Is bigtenplus.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bigtenplus.com Reviews

B

Is bigtenplus.com Safe? Security Analysis for B1G+

Check if bigtenplus.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:14:10 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.bigtenplus.com currently serves as a placeholder page displaying a message that the B1G+ service is not available in the visitor's region. There is no substantive business information, metadata, or structured data available to provide insight into the company's operations, services, or market positioning. The domain appears unregistered or WHOIS data is not publicly available, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and operational status of the website. Technically, the site is minimal with no detected CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools. Security posture is poor due to lack of HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the site lacks essential trust and compliance indicators, making it unsuitable for business or consumer engagement at this time.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The website does not provide any contact information, company details, or service descriptions. The presence of external images hosted on sportradar.com suggests a possible association with sports data or media, but this is not confirmed. The lack of registration and minimal content indicate the site may be inactive, under development, or abandoned.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a very low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS usage or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. These factors collectively indicate a high risk for users and a poor security posture for the domain.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available and accurate.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website currently displays a regional availability message indicating that B1G+ service is not available in the visitor's region. No further business description or services information is provided.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and only shows a regional restriction message.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(790 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.223.49.83, 13.248.171.227
Name Servers:
ns01.dns.foxDNS only
ns01.foxdoua.com
ns02.dns.foxDNS only
ns02.foxdoua.com
ns03.dns.foxDNS only
ns03.foxdoua.com
ns04.dns.foxDNS only
ns04.foxdoua.com
SOA:Serial: 1757203232, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:128ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a simple static HTML page with inline CSS and no JavaScript or external scripts detected except for images loaded from an external domain. There is no CMS or framework detected. The site lacks meta tags, Open Graph, or JSON-LD structured data. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No analytics or tracking technologies are present. The technical implementation is minimal and requires significant enhancement for a production business website.
Analyze Another Website