Skip to main content

Is biosimilarsresources.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Biosimilars Patient Resource Center Reviews

biosimilarsresources.org favicon

Is biosimilarsresources.org Safe? Security Analysis for Biosimilars Patient Resource Center

Check if biosimilarsresources.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareUnited Statesmedium
WordPressGravity FormsWPBakery Page BuilderYoast SEOSuperfly Menu+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:58:25 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Biosimilars Patient Resource Center is an educational website dedicated to providing information about biosimilar medicines to patients, caregivers, medical professionals, and policymakers. It is affiliated with the Biosimilars Council and the Association for Accessible Medicines, positioning itself as a trusted resource in the healthcare sector focused on biosimilars. The site offers patient stories, resources, and educational content to increase awareness and understanding of biosimilar therapies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Gravity Forms and WPBakery Page Builder, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy linked externally but no cookie consent mechanism on the site. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and serves its informational purpose well, though improvements in security transparency and privacy compliance are recommended.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsWPBakery Page BuilderYoast SEOSuperfly MenuSassy Social Share

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets a niche healthcare market focused on biosimilar medicines, serving patients and healthcare stakeholders. Its business model is informational and educational, likely funded or supported by industry associations such as the Association for Accessible Medicines. The site leverages partnerships with recognized organizations to enhance credibility. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include sponsorships or advocacy funding. The presence of social media channels and email sign-ups indicates active engagement strategies. Growth potential lies in expanding educational outreach and resource offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes accessiblemeds.org and biosimilarscouncil.org, reinforcing its authoritative position in the biosimilars domain.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified but reduces registrant transparency. The site uses third-party marketing and analytics scripts, which may increase privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adopting best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Biosimilars Patient Resource Center

Description:

Biosimilar medicines give 1.2 million patients in the United States access to life-changing results. Learn more about these medicines.

Key Services:
Educational content about biosimilarsPatient storiesResource libraryEmail series sign-up
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsWPBakery Page BuilderYoast SEOSuperfly MenuSassy Social Share
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from Gravity Forms and popup maker usage)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagSnapchat PixelTwitter Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
StackAdaptTwitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagSnapchat PixelTwitter Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Popup Maker
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a patient resource center focused on biosimilar medicines

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 18 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(963 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.185.40.226
Name Servers:
ns57.domaincontrol.com
ns58.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023082100, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:251ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms for data collection, WPBakery Page Builder for layout, and Yoast SEO for search optimization. Hosting appears to be through GoDaddy with domaincontrol.com nameservers. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and StackAdapt ads. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact privacy and security if not managed properly. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy mechanisms to align with best practices.
Analyze Another Website