Skip to main content

Is bird.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Blue Jay Transit, Inc. Reviews

bird.co favicon

Is bird.co Safe? Security Analysis for Blue Jay Transit, Inc.

Check if bird.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationUnited Stateslarge
WordPressGravity FormsjQueryfullPage.jsVimeo Player API+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:32:49 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bird (Blue Jay Transit, Inc.) operates a leading micro-mobility platform offering electric scooters and bikes across hundreds of cities worldwide. The company positions itself as an eco-friendly urban transportation provider with a strong market presence and NYSE listing under BRDS. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrated analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though dedicated security and incident response policies are not publicly detailed. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism, compliance with privacy regulations, and a trustworthy brand image.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsjQueryfullPage.jsVimeo Player APIGoogle Tag ManagerSecuriti.ai cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bird's business model centers on shared electric micro-mobility vehicles, targeting urban commuters and environmentally conscious riders. The company leverages partnerships with cities and fleet managers, offering both consumer rentals and fleet operation platforms. The presence of multiple language versions and active blog content indicates a global and engaged audience. The company benefits from strong branding consistency and trust signals such as legal disclosures and social media presence. The parent company is Third Lane Mobility Inc., suggesting a broader corporate structure supporting Bird's operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and multiple security headers, indicating a solid baseline security posture. Use of cookie consent tools and privacy policies aligns with GDPR compliance. No direct contact for security incidents or vulnerability disclosure programs were found, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Blue Jay Transit, Inc.

Description:

Bird electric bikes and scooters are providing eco-friendly transportation for riders in hundreds of cities around the world. NYSE: BRDS.

Key Services:
Electric scooter rentalsElectric bike rentalsFleet management platformCity partnerships
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsjQueryfullPage.jsVimeo Player APIGoogle Tag ManagerSecuriti.ai cookie consent
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:bird.co.spf.bird.co include:shops.shopify.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1392-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:bird-dmarc@bird.co
Forensic Reports:bird-dmarc@bird.co

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(128 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.3, 52.85.49.51, 52.85.49.85, 52.85.49.109
Name Servers:
ns-1380.awsdns-44.org
ns-1558.awsdns-02.co.uk
ns-478.awsdns-59.com
ns-795.awsdns-35.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:bird.co.spf.bird.co include:shops.shopify.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with extensive use of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, fullPage.js for UI effects, and Vimeo Player API for embedded videos. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate with caching and asset optimization evident but could be improved further. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Analyze Another Website