Skip to main content

Is birojafitness.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - birojafitness.lv Reviews

birojafitness.lv favicon

Is birojafitness.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Biroja Fitness | vingro darba vietā | Latvia

Check if birojafitness.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:07:03 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.birojafitness.lv is currently inaccessible for comprehensive analysis due to a WHOIS query limit error and minimal accessible content, likely caused by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or rate limiting mechanisms. The site appears to be built on the Wix platform, but no meaningful business, contact, or policy information is available for review. Consequently, the technical infrastructure and digital maturity cannot be assessed in detail. Security posture evaluation is limited by the lack of accessible data, with no security headers or policies detected. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to the absence of transparency and verifiable information, and strategic recommendations focus on improving accessibility and transparency.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The absence of contact information, privacy policies, or business descriptions suggests a low level of business credibility and market presence. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The business model, target audience, and market positioning remain unknown.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@birojafitness.lvPiesakies

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to blocked content and missing WHOIS data. No security headers, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures were found. The presence of a WAF or rate limiting indicates some level of security control, but the lack of transparency and missing policies represent compliance gaps and potential risks. No SSL or HTTPS configuration details were available for assessment.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Improve website accessibility by resolving WAF or rate limiting issues to allow full content delivery.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

WHOIS query limit exceeded error and no meaningful website content available; likely blocked by WAF or rate limiting.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv include:sendersrv.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:513ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv include:sendersrv.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Wix platform, as indicated by meta tags and script sources. However, due to content blocking or rate limiting, technical details such as performance, SEO optimization, accessibility, and security headers cannot be fully analyzed. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected in the accessible content. The site lacks visible forms or data collection mechanisms in the accessible HTML. Overall, the technical implementation appears minimal or blocked, limiting the ability to assess infrastructure quality or modernization opportunities.
Analyze Another Website