Skip to main content

Is bitbang.social a Scam? Security Check Results - bitbang.social Reviews

bitbang.social favicon

Is bitbang.social Safe? Security Analysis for bitbang.social

Check if bitbang.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Mastodon 4.0.15JavaScriptReact (implied by react-helmet meta tags)FontAwesome iconsWebSockets (wss://bitbang.social)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:49:30 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

bitbang.social operates as a small Mastodon instance within the decentralized social network ecosystem known as the Fediverse. It provides users with a platform to explore posts, hashtags, and news across federated servers, targeting a general audience interested in retro and nostalgic themes. The platform is administered by a user named Action Retro and currently supports approximately 218 active users, indicating a modest but engaged community. The business model revolves around providing decentralized social networking services without centralized control or advertising revenue streams. Technically, the website leverages Mastodon version 4.0.15, built on modern web technologies including React and WebSockets for real-time communication. The site is well-structured with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Security is implemented with HTTPS and CSRF protections, although some standard security headers are missing. The site does not employ advertising or extensive tracking, aligning with privacy-conscious principles common in decentralized networks. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid baseline with encrypted communications and token-based protections. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for such community-driven platforms, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and security headers. The overall risk assessment is low given the nature of the platform and its community focus. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance, publishing clear terms of service and security policies, and adding standard security headers to harden the site against common web threats. Enhancing transparency around incident response and vulnerability reporting would further strengthen trust and security culture.

Detected Technologies

Mastodon 4.0.15JavaScriptReact (implied by react-helmet meta tags)FontAwesome iconsWebSockets (wss://bitbang.social)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

bitbang.social positions itself as a niche Mastodon instance catering to users interested in retro computing and nostalgic digital culture. Its competitive advantage lies in its thematic focus and integration within the broader Mastodon and Fediverse ecosystem, allowing users to interact across decentralized servers. The business model is community-driven without evident monetization, relying on voluntary participation and federation. The target customer segment includes tech-savvy users and enthusiasts of vintage technology. Growth indicators include active user counts and trending hashtags, although the scale remains small. The platform maintains partnerships with Mastodon official resources and open-source communities, reflecting a collaborative ecosystem. Operationally, the instance is managed by a single administrator, indicating a lean organizational structure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of bitbang.social is moderate to good. The site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens to protect user interactions. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options limits its defense-in-depth capabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Data protection practices appear minimal but aligned with the decentralized and privacy-conscious ethos of Mastodon instances. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security culture is basic but functional, with opportunities for improvement in transparency and policy documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to enhance privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

bitbang.social

Description:

Mastodon hosted on bitbang.social. "Hey, do you like old things? Beeps and boops? Welcome home!"

Key Services:
decentralized social networkingprofile directorytrending posts and hashtags
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Mastodon 4.0.15JavaScriptReact (implied by react-helmet meta tags)FontAwesome iconsWebSockets (wss://bitbang.social)
Frameworks:
MastodonReact
Platforms:
decentralized social network (Fediverse)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • Content Security Policy nonce present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Mastodon social network instance with decentralized federation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:bitbang.social
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/5/2025 (61 days)
SANs:bitbang.social, *.bitbang.social

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.48.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001
Name Servers:
boyd.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
mimi.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.protonmail.ch
20: mailsec.protonmail.ch
SOA:Serial: 2381345429, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:47ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Mastodon 4.0.15, utilizing React and WebSocket technologies for a dynamic and interactive user experience. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in loading or rendering. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a decentralized social network instance. However, the absence of a CMS or advanced hosting details limits deeper infrastructure insights. The site uses standard meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. There is no evidence of third-party advertising or tracking scripts, aligning with privacy-focused design. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and privacy mechanisms would improve robustness.
Analyze Another Website