Skip to main content

Is bitcoinfoundation.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - bitcoinfoundation.lv Reviews

B

Is bitcoinfoundation.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if bitcoinfoundation.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:14:38 AM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website bitcoinfoundation.lv is currently inaccessible as a normal content site and instead presents a security challenge page powered by BitNinja. This page requires visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to verify they are not automated bots before accessing the requested content. Due to this security mechanism, no business or organizational information is available on the page, and the WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits. The site uses outdated CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, indicating legacy or misconfigured platform usage. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The security posture is limited by the lack of visible security headers and absence of privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is currently in a blocked state, limiting the ability to perform a full analysis.

Detected Technologies

Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data is available from the site content due to the security challenge page blocking access. There is no visible company name, contact information, or business description. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, preventing verification of registrant details or domain age. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja's security services, which may indicate a focus on security but also limits transparency. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja's WAF and CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated and malicious traffic, which is a positive security control. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. The use of outdated CMS versions may expose the site to vulnerabilities if not properly patched. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. WHOIS data unavailability further reduces trust and transparency. The security score is moderate but limited by these factors.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The page is a security challenge page by BitNinja requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating WAF or security filtering is active.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a security challenge page requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed. It does not provide business or organizational information.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a CAPTCHA security challenge by BitNinja.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:213.227.132.36 ip4:83.149.73.233 ip4:37.48.121.23 ip4:37.48.121.27 +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: bitcoinfoundation.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071201, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:133ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:213.227.132.36 ip4:83.149.73.233 ip4:37.48.121.23 ip4:37.48.121.27 +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and potentially insecure. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is implemented for bot mitigation. The page is minimalistic and primarily serves as a security checkpoint rather than a content delivery platform. Performance is moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta tags. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional for security purposes but lacks modern CMS and content delivery best practices.
Analyze Another Website