Skip to main content

Is bitfinity.network a Scam? Security Check Results - bitfinity.network Reviews

bitfinity.network favicon

Is bitfinity.network Safe? Security Analysis for Bitfinity Network

Check if bitfinity.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactChakra UIJavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:31:52 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bitfinity Network appears to be a technology-oriented website, likely related to blockchain or decentralized networks, based on the domain name and partial content cues. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking content. However, the site content is minimal with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and lacks contact information, which limits its business credibility and trustworthiness. The technical infrastructure uses modern web technologies such as React and Chakra UI, indicating a contemporary development approach. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible security headers and no SSL configuration details available. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the site scores low to moderate on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, with significant gaps in privacy compliance and security posture.

Detected Technologies

ReactChakra UIJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind Bitfinity Network is not clearly identified on the website. There is no registrant or company information available from WHOIS data, and no contact details or policies are present on the site. The business model and market position cannot be confidently determined, but the domain and styling suggest a focus on blockchain or network technology services. The lack of external links, social media presence, or partner domains indicates a limited public footprint or early-stage project. The absence of certifications or trust indicators further limits confidence in the business operations. Growth indicators and partnership ecosystem are not discernible from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration details. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others are not detected. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. The lack of contact channels for security incidents or abuse reports further reduces readiness for incident response. Overall, the site presents a low maturity level in security and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Bitfinity Network appears to be a technology-focused business, likely in blockchain or decentralized network services, based on the domain name and partial content styling references.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactChakra UIJavaScript
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 40, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React and styled with Chakra UI, indicating a modern front-end technology stack. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements, suggesting good mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of styles and scripts. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of analytics or marketing tools integrated. The technical debt appears low but the site lacks advanced SEO and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website